Velázquez Raúl F, Linhares Alexandre C, Muñoz Sergio, Seron Pamela, Lorca Pedro, DeAntonio Rodrigo, Ortega-Barria Eduardo
Unidad de Investigación Médica en Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital de Pediatría, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México.
Instituto Evandro Chagas, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Virology Section, Av. Almirante Barroso 492, 66.090-000, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Jan 13;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0771-y.
RotaTeq™ (RV5; Merck & Co. Inc., USA) and Rotarix™ (RV1, GlaxoSmithKline, Belgium) vaccines, developed to prevent rotavirus diarrhea in children under five years old, were both introduced into national immunization programs in 2006. As many countries in Latin America and the Caribbean have included either RV5 or RV1 in their routine childhood vaccination programs, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze efficacy, safety and effectiveness data from the region.
We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, Scielo, Lilacs and the Cochrane Central Register, for controlled efficacy, safety and effectiveness studies published between January 2000 until December 2011, on RV5 and RV1 across Latin America (where both vaccines are available since 2006). The primary outcome measures were: rotavirus-related gastroenteritis of any severity; rotavirus emergency department visits and hospitalization; and severe adverse events.
The results of the meta-analysis for efficacy show that RV1 reduced the risk of any-severity rotavirus-related gastroenteritis by 65% (relative risk (RR) 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25; 0.50), and of severe gastroenteritis by 82% (RR 0.18, 95%CI 0.12; 0.26) versus placebo. In trials, both vaccines significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization and emergency visits by 85% (RR 0.15, 95%CI 0.09; 0.25) for RV1 and by 90% (RR 0.099, 95%CI 0.012; 0.77) for RV5. Vaccination with RV5 or RV1 did not increase the risk of death, intussusception, or other severe adverse events which were previously associated with the first licensed rotavirus vaccine. Real-world effectiveness studies showed that both vaccines reduced rotavirus hospitalization in the region by around 45-50% for RV5 (for 1 to 3 doses, respectively), and, by around 50-80% for RV1 (for 1 to 2 doses, respectively). For RV1, effectiveness against hospitalization was highest (around 80-96%) for children vaccinated before 12 months of age, compared with 5-60% effectiveness in older children. Both vaccines were most effective in preventing more severe gastroenteritis (70% for RV5 and 80-90% for RV1) and severe gastroenteritis (50% for RV5 and 70-80% for RV1).
This systematic literature review confirms rotavirus vaccination has been proven effective and well tolerated in protecting children in Latin America and the Caribbean.
用于预防五岁以下儿童轮状病毒腹泻的Rotateq™(RV5,美国默克公司)和Rotarix™(RV1,比利时葛兰素史克公司)疫苗于2006年被纳入国家免疫规划。由于拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的许多国家已将RV5或RV1纳入其常规儿童疫苗接种计划,我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以分析该地区的疗效、安全性和有效性数据。
我们在PubMed、EMBASE、Scielo、Lilacs和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库中进行了系统检索,以查找2000年1月至2011年12月期间在拉丁美洲(自2006年起两种疫苗均有供应)发表的关于RV5和RV1的对照疗效、安全性和有效性研究。主要结局指标为:任何严重程度的轮状病毒相关性胃肠炎;轮状病毒急诊就诊和住院情况;以及严重不良事件。
荟萃分析的疗效结果显示,与安慰剂相比,RV1将任何严重程度的轮状病毒相关性胃肠炎风险降低了65%(相对风险(RR)0.35,95%置信区间(CI)0.25;0.50),将严重胃肠炎风险降低了82%(RR 0.18,95%CI 0.12;0.26)。在试验中,两种疫苗均显著降低了住院和急诊就诊风险,RV1降低了85%(RR 0.15,95%CI 0.09;0.25),RV5降低了90%(RR 0.099,95%CI 0.012;0.77)。接种RV5或RV1并未增加死亡、肠套叠或其他先前与第一种获得许可的轮状病毒疫苗相关的严重不良事件的风险。实际效果研究表明,两种疫苗均使该地区的轮状病毒住院率降低,RV5降低了约45 - 50%(分别针对1至3剂),RV1降低了约50 - 80%(分别针对1至2剂)。对于RV1,12个月龄前接种疫苗的儿童预防住院的有效性最高(约80 - 96%),而大龄儿童的有效性为5 - 60%。两种疫苗在预防更严重的胃肠炎(RV5为70%,RV1为80 - 90%)和严重胃肠炎(RV5为50%,RV1为70 - 80%)方面最为有效。
这项系统文献综述证实,轮状病毒疫苗在保护拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的儿童方面已被证明有效且耐受性良好。