Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 15;201(8):e26-e51. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202002-0251ST.
The diagnosis of sarcoidosis is not standardized but is based on three major criteria: a compatible clinical presentation, finding nonnecrotizing granulomatous inflammation in one or more tissue samples, and the exclusion of alternative causes of granulomatous disease. There are no universally accepted measures to determine if each diagnostic criterion has been satisfied; therefore, the diagnosis of sarcoidosis is never fully secure. Systematic reviews and, when appropriate, meta-analyses were performed to summarize the best available evidence. The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach and then discussed by a multidisciplinary panel. Recommendations for or against various diagnostic tests were formulated and graded after the expert panel weighed desirable and undesirable consequences, certainty of estimates, feasibility, and acceptability. The clinical presentation, histopathology, and exclusion of alternative diagnoses were summarized. On the basis of the available evidence, the expert committee made 1 strong recommendation for baseline serum calcium testing, 13 conditional recommendations, and 1 best practice statement. All evidence was very low quality. The panel used systematic reviews of the evidence to inform clinical recommendations in favor of or against various diagnostic tests in patients with suspected or known sarcoidosis. The evidence and recommendations should be revisited as new evidence becomes available.
结节病的诊断尚无标准化方法,但基于以下三个主要标准:与临床表现相符、在一个或多个组织样本中发现非坏死性肉芽肿性炎症,以及排除其他肉芽肿性疾病的原因。目前尚无通用的方法来确定是否满足每个诊断标准;因此,结节病的诊断并非完全确定。采用系统综述的方法,并在适当情况下进行荟萃分析,以总结最佳可用证据。使用推荐评估、制定与评价分级方法评估证据,然后由多学科小组进行讨论。在专家小组权衡了利弊、估计的确定性、可行性和可接受性之后,制定并分级了各种诊断测试的推荐或反对意见。总结了临床表现、组织病理学和排除其他诊断。根据现有证据,专家委员会提出了 1 项关于基线血清钙检测的强烈推荐意见、13 项有条件推荐意见和 1 项最佳实践声明。所有证据的质量均为极低。该小组使用证据的系统综述,为疑似或已知结节病患者的各种诊断测试提供了支持或反对的临床建议。随着新证据的出现,应重新审查证据和建议。