Johnson Kevin N, Jaroszewski Dawn E, Ewais MennatAllah, Lackey Jesse J, McMahon Lisa, Notrica David M
Division of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Arizona.
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Arizona.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;99(6):1936-43. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.02.078. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
Successful repair of recurrent pectus excavatum (PE) after failed open procedure has been reported using minimally invasive repair (MIRPE) and open approaches. Neither approach alone may be adequate for some patients. A hybrid technique for repair is presented for revision of recurrent PE.
A retrospective review of adults undergoing repair for recurrent PE after prior open repair from January 2010 to June 2014 was performed.
Seventy-three adult patients underwent repair for recurrent PE, with 48 patients (65.8%) undergoing repair for recurrence after at least one prior open PE repair. Mean patient age was 34.5 years (range, 19 to 54 years); mean Haller index was 4.7 (range, 2.8 to 14.7). Fourteen (29%) recurrences with adequate chest wall pliability and no malunion were repaired with MIRPE alone; 34 patients (71%) underwent a hybrid procedure for repair (20 for PE recurrence alone; 14 for PE with acquired thoracic dystrophy). All had at least two support bars placed, and 11 patients (23%) had three bars placed. Mean hospitalization for MIRPE was 5 days, for hybrid was 7 days, and for hybrid because of acquired thoracic dystrophy was 10 days. One patient died of unexpected out-of-hospital arrest; there was one emergent conversion to open sternotomy for bleeding.
Most recurrent PE may be repaired with excellent results and minimal complications. Those with adequate chest pliability and no malunion are candidates for MIPRE alone. A hybrid procedure with thoracoscopic support bars combined with sternal elevation, multiple open osteotomies, and chest wall fixation is appropriate for recurrences associated with malunion or fixation of the anterior chest and failure to lift with MIRPE.
已有报道称,采用微创修复术(MIRPE)和开放手术方法可成功修复开放性手术失败后的复发性漏斗胸(PE)。但对于某些患者,单独使用这两种方法可能都不够。本文介绍一种用于复发性PE翻修的联合技术。
对2010年1月至2014年6月期间因复发性PE在先前开放性修复术后接受修复手术的成年人进行回顾性研究。
73例成年患者接受了复发性PE修复手术,其中48例(65.8%)在至少一次先前开放性PE修复术后因复发接受修复。患者平均年龄为34.5岁(范围19至54岁);平均Haller指数为4.7(范围2.8至14.7)。14例(29%)胸壁柔韧性良好且无骨不连的复发患者仅采用MIRPE修复;34例患者(71%)接受了联合手术修复(20例仅为PE复发;14例为合并获得性胸廓发育不良的PE)。所有患者至少置入了两根支撑棒,11例患者(23%)置入了三根支撑棒。MIRPE的平均住院时间为5天,联合手术为7天,因获得性胸廓发育不良接受联合手术的为10天。1例患者死于意外的院外心脏骤停;1例因出血紧急转为开放性胸骨切开术。
大多数复发性PE可通过良好的效果和最小的并发症进行修复。胸壁柔韧性良好且无骨不连的患者仅适合MIPRE。胸腔镜支撑棒联合胸骨抬高、多处开放性截骨术和胸壁固定的联合手术适用于与骨不连或前胸固定相关的复发以及MIRPE无法抬起的情况。