Suppr超能文献

成人漏斗胸患者失败的既往 Nuss 手术修复。

Revision of Failed Prior Nuss in Adult Patients With Pectus Excavatum.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona.

Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Feb;105(2):371-378. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.08.051. Epub 2017 Dec 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) has been extended to repair of defects in adults, with reported higher complication rates and outcome failures. The optimal revision for a prior failed MIRPE in an adult has not been identified. We review our experience for this adult population.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 129 patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent revision after a failed pectus excavatum (PE) repair from December 2010 through December 2016.

RESULTS

In total, 47 of the 129 (36%) revision patients had a prior failed MIRPE, with 98% presenting for revision because of inadequate correction after their initial repair. The median age was 28 years (range, 18 to 54 years), and 77% were men. Thirty-one (66%) patients had indwelling pectus support bars at the revision procedure. Mean time from initial MIRPE to the revision procedure was 3.34 ± 2.9 years. A modified MIRPE was successful in 39 (83%) patients. Hybrid repair with the addition of osteotomy cuts and/or titanium plating was required in 8 patients for an adequate revision. Multiple (2 bars, 62%; 3 bars, 38%), shorter (median, 13.5 inches versus 15.0 inches) bars were used for the revision versus earlier repair. Substantial lysis of intrathoracic adhesions was required in 40 (85%) patients, with a median operative time for revision MIRPE of 169 ± 66 minutes; median operative time for hybrid procedures, 314 ± 74 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

A modified MIRPE can be successfully used in most adults to revise a failed prior MIRPE.

摘要

背景

微创漏斗胸修复术(MIRPE)已扩展用于修复成年人的缺陷,但报告的并发症发生率和治疗结果失败率更高。对于成年人先前失败的 MIRPE,尚未确定最佳的修正方法。我们回顾了我们在这一成年人群体中的经验。

方法

对 2010 年 12 月至 2016 年 12 月期间因初次修复后效果不理想而接受漏斗胸修复术(PE)修复后失败的 129 例(年龄≥18 岁)患者进行回顾性分析。

结果

共有 47 例(36%)修复患者先前有过 MIRPE 失败史,98%的患者因初次修复后矫正不足而进行修复。患者的中位年龄为 28 岁(范围,18 至 54 岁),77%为男性。31 例(66%)患者在修复手术时留有内置的胸壁支撑条。从初次 MIRPE 到修复手术的平均时间为 3.34±2.9 年。39 例(83%)患者的改良 MIRPE 获得成功。对于 8 例患者,由于需要充分修复,采用了混合修复术,包括截骨术和/或钛板固定术。修复时使用的支撑条数量更多(2 条,62%;3 条,38%)且更短(中位数,13.5 英寸与 15.0 英寸)。40 例(85%)患者需要大量松解胸腔内粘连,改良 MIRPE 的平均手术时间为 169±66 分钟;混合手术的平均手术时间为 314±74 分钟。

结论

改良 MIRPE 可成功用于大多数成年人来修正先前失败的 MIRPE。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验