Parm Ülle, Metsvaht Tuuli, Ilmoja Mari-Liis, Lutsar Irja
Department of Microbiology, University of Tartu, Estonia; Tartu Health Care College, Estonia.
University Clinics of Tartu, Estonia.
Nutr Res. 2015 Jun;35(6):496-503. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
We hypothesized that the beneficial effects of early enteral compared with parenteral feeding are related to the increased variety of aerobic microorganisms that colonize the gut. Our aim was to describe the relationship, first, between the type of feeding and mucosal colonization and, second, between the type of feeding and the development of late-onset sepsis (LOS) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm neonates. In total, 159 neonates aged 72 hours or less with risk factors for early-onset sepsis were recruited to a prospective 2-center study. Rectal swabs were collected on admission and twice per week thereafter. The feeding regimen was recorded for the first 7 days and categorized into total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and 2 regimens of enteral nutrition, that is, breast milk containing regimen (BMCR), for which breast milk constituted at least 11% of the enteral diet, or formula. Herein, 70 neonates received formula, 48 received BMCR, and 41 received TPN; 69 cases of LOS and 15 cases of NEC were observed in 50 neonates. A multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that formula and BMCR were associated with 4- to 5-fold increases in colonization by Gram-negative bacteria (odds ratio [OR], 4.52; 1.87-10.95, and OR, 4.95; 1.90-12.87, respectively) and 5 to 9 times higher odds of colonization by Gram-positive microorganisms (OR, 5.75; 1.89-16.72, and OR, 8.61; 2.52-29.36, respectively) compared with TPN. The only difference between BMCR and the other feeding groups was the higher colonization with Staphylococcus haemolyticus in the latter (formula-OR, 6.24; 1.73-22.50; TPN-OR, 2.75; 1.08-6.97). Compared with BMCR, TPN was associated with an increased odds of LOS (OR, 3.04; 1.02-9.07) and an increased odds of death (19.75; 3.64-107.12) compared with formula. Although early enteral feeding is associated with a higher odds of colonization with opportunistic microorganisms, it should be preferred over TPN whenever feasible, due to the favorable effect on the prevention of LOS.
我们推测,与肠外营养相比,早期肠内营养的有益效果与肠道内需氧微生物种类的增加有关。我们的目的是,首先描述喂养方式与黏膜定植之间的关系,其次描述喂养方式与早产儿晚发性败血症(LOS)和坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)发生发展之间的关系。共有159例72小时及以下且有早发性败血症风险因素的新生儿被纳入一项前瞻性双中心研究。入院时及之后每周两次采集直肠拭子。记录前7天的喂养方案,并分为全肠外营养(TPN)和两种肠内营养方案,即母乳含入方案(BMCR),其中母乳占肠内饮食的至少11%,或配方奶。在此,70例新生儿接受配方奶,48例接受BMCR,41例接受TPN;50例新生儿中观察到69例LOS和15例NEC。多因素logistic回归分析表明,与TPN相比,配方奶和BMCR使革兰氏阴性菌定植增加4至5倍(优势比[OR]分别为4.52;1.87 - 10.95和OR为4.95;1.90 - 12.87),革兰氏阳性微生物定植的优势比高5至9倍(OR分别为5.75;1.89 - 16.72和OR为8.61;2.52 - 29.36)。BMCR与其他喂养组之间的唯一差异是后者(配方奶 - OR为6.24;1.73 - 22.50;TPN - OR为2.75;1.08 - 6.97)溶血葡萄球菌的定植率更高。与BMCR相比,TPN与LOS的优势比增加(OR为3.04;1.02 - 9.07)以及与配方奶相比死亡优势比增加(19.75;3.64 - 107.12)相关。尽管早期肠内营养与机会性微生物定植的优势比更高相关,但由于对预防LOS有有利作用,只要可行,就应优先于TPN。