Suppr超能文献

踝关节骨关节炎患者足踝结局评分的评估

Evaluation of the foot and ankle outcome score in patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle.

作者信息

Mani S B, Do H, Vulcano E, Hogan M V, Lyman S, Deland J T, Ellis S J

机构信息

Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, 10021, USA.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2015 May;97-B(5):662-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B5.33940.

Abstract

The foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) has been evaluated for many conditions of the foot and ankle. We evaluated its construct validity in 136 patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle, its content validity in 37 patients and its responsiveness in 39. Data were collected prospectively from the registry of patients at our institution. All FAOS subscales were rated relevant by patients. The Pain, Activities of Daily Living, and Quality of Life subscales showed good correlation with the Physical Component score of the Short-Form-12v2. All subscales except Symptoms were responsive to change after surgery. We concluded that the FAOS is a weak instrument for evaluating osteoarthritis of the ankle. However, some of the FAOS subscales have relative strengths that allow for its limited use while we continue to seek other satisfactory outcome instruments.

摘要

足踝结果评分(FAOS)已针对多种足踝病症进行了评估。我们评估了其在136例踝关节骨关节炎患者中的结构效度、在37例患者中的内容效度以及在39例患者中的反应度。数据是前瞻性地从我们机构的患者登记处收集的。所有FAOS子量表患者均评定为相关。疼痛、日常生活活动和生活质量子量表与简式健康调查12项第2版的生理健康评分显示出良好的相关性。除症状子量表外,所有子量表在术后对变化均有反应。我们得出结论,FAOS是评估踝关节骨关节炎的一个较弱工具。然而,FAOS的一些子量表具有相对优势,在我们继续寻找其他令人满意的结果评估工具时,可有限度地使用它。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验