Mani S B, Do H, Vulcano E, Hogan M V, Lyman S, Deland J T, Ellis S J
Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, 10021, USA.
Bone Joint J. 2015 May;97-B(5):662-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B5.33940.
The foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) has been evaluated for many conditions of the foot and ankle. We evaluated its construct validity in 136 patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle, its content validity in 37 patients and its responsiveness in 39. Data were collected prospectively from the registry of patients at our institution. All FAOS subscales were rated relevant by patients. The Pain, Activities of Daily Living, and Quality of Life subscales showed good correlation with the Physical Component score of the Short-Form-12v2. All subscales except Symptoms were responsive to change after surgery. We concluded that the FAOS is a weak instrument for evaluating osteoarthritis of the ankle. However, some of the FAOS subscales have relative strengths that allow for its limited use while we continue to seek other satisfactory outcome instruments.
足踝结果评分(FAOS)已针对多种足踝病症进行了评估。我们评估了其在136例踝关节骨关节炎患者中的结构效度、在37例患者中的内容效度以及在39例患者中的反应度。数据是前瞻性地从我们机构的患者登记处收集的。所有FAOS子量表患者均评定为相关。疼痛、日常生活活动和生活质量子量表与简式健康调查12项第2版的生理健康评分显示出良好的相关性。除症状子量表外,所有子量表在术后对变化均有反应。我们得出结论,FAOS是评估踝关节骨关节炎的一个较弱工具。然而,FAOS的一些子量表具有相对优势,在我们继续寻找其他令人满意的结果评估工具时,可有限度地使用它。