Lawler Joshua J, Ackerly David D, Albano Christine M, Anderson Mark G, Dobrowski Solomon Z, Gill Jacquelyn L, Heller Nicole E, Pressey Robert L, Sanderson Eric W, Weiss Stuart B
School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98115, U.S.A.
Department of Integrative Biology and Jepson Herbarium, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, U.S.A.
Conserv Biol. 2015 Jun;29(3):618-29. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12505. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
Most conservation planning to date has focused on protecting today's biodiversity with the assumption that it will be tomorrow's biodiversity. However, modern climate change has already resulted in distributional shifts of some species and is projected to result in many more shifts in the coming decades. As species redistribute and biotic communities reorganize, conservation plans based on current patterns of biodiversity may fail to adequately protect species in the future. One approach for addressing this issue is to focus on conserving a range of abiotic conditions in the conservation-planning process. By doing so, it may be possible to conserve an abiotically diverse "stage" upon which evolution will play out and support many actors (biodiversity). We reviewed the fundamental underpinnings of the concept of conserving the abiotic stage, starting with the early observations of von Humboldt, who mapped the concordance of abiotic conditions and vegetation, and progressing to the concept of the ecological niche. We discuss challenges posed by issues of spatial and temporal scale, the role of biotic drivers of species distributions, and latitudinal and topographic variation in relationships between climate and landform. For example, abiotic conditions are not static, but change through time-albeit at different and often relatively slow rates. In some places, biotic interactions play a substantial role in structuring patterns of biodiversity, meaning that patterns of biodiversity may be less tightly linked to the abiotic stage. Furthermore, abiotic drivers of biodiversity can change with latitude and topographic position, meaning that the abiotic stage may need to be defined differently in different places. We conclude that protecting a diversity of abiotic conditions will likely best conserve biodiversity into the future in places where abiotic drivers of species distributions are strong relative to biotic drivers, where the diversity of abiotic settings will be conserved through time, and where connectivity allows for movement among areas providing different abiotic conditions.
迄今为止,大多数保护规划都聚焦于保护当下的生物多样性,并假定它会是未来的生物多样性。然而,现代气候变化已经导致一些物种的分布发生了变化,预计在未来几十年还会引发更多变化。随着物种重新分布以及生物群落重新组织,基于当前生物多样性模式的保护计划可能无法在未来充分保护物种。解决这一问题的一种方法是在保护规划过程中专注于保护一系列非生物条件。这样做或许能够保护一个非生物多样的“舞台”,进化将在这个舞台上展开,并支持众多参与者(生物多样性)。我们回顾了保护非生物舞台这一概念的基本支撑,从冯·洪堡的早期观察开始,他绘制了非生物条件与植被的一致性图谱,进而发展到生态位的概念。我们讨论了空间和时间尺度问题、物种分布的生物驱动因素的作用以及气候与地形关系中的纬度和地形变化所带来的挑战。例如,非生物条件并非一成不变,而是随时间变化——尽管变化速度不同且往往相对较慢。在某些地方,生物相互作用在构建生物多样性模式方面发挥着重要作用,这意味着生物多样性模式可能与非生物舞台的联系没那么紧密。此外,生物多样性的非生物驱动因素会随纬度和地形位置而变化,这意味着在不同地方可能需要对非生物舞台进行不同的定义。我们得出结论,在物种分布的非生物驱动因素相对于生物驱动因素较强、非生物环境的多样性将随时间得以保存且连通性允许在提供不同非生物条件的区域之间移动的地方,保护多样的非生物条件可能最有利于在未来保护生物多样性。