• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双语能力与两种广泛使用的发育神经心理测试组合的表现

Bilingualism and performance on two widely used developmental neuropsychological test batteries.

作者信息

Karlsson Linda C, Soveri Anna, Räsänen Pekka, Kärnä Antti, Delatte Sonia, Lagerström Emma, Mård Lena, Steffansson Mikaela, Lehtonen Minna, Laine Matti

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.

Niilo Mäki Institute, Jyväskylä, Finland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Apr 29;10(4):e0125867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125867. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0125867
PMID:25922937
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4414566/
Abstract

The present study investigated the effect of bilingualism on the two widely used developmental neuropsychological test batteries Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) and A Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment, Second Edition (NEPSY-II) in children. The sample consisted of 100 Finland-Swedish children in two age groups. About half (n = 52) of the participants were early simultaneous bilinguals, and the other half (n = 48) were monolinguals. As no Finland-Swedish versions of the tests are available at the moment, both tests were translated and adapted to suit this population. The results revealed no difference in the performance between bilingual and monolingual children. This speaks against a cognitive advantage in bilingual children and indicates that development of separate norms for monolingual and bilingual children is not needed for clinical use.

摘要

本研究调查了双语能力对两种广泛使用的儿童发育神经心理测试量表的影响,这两种量表分别是《韦氏儿童智力量表-第四版》(WISC-IV)和《发育神经心理评估第二版》(NEPSY-II)。样本由100名芬兰瑞典裔儿童组成,分为两个年龄组。大约一半(n = 52)的参与者是早期同时双语者,另一半(n = 48)是单语者。由于目前没有芬兰瑞典语版本的测试,因此对这两种测试都进行了翻译和改编以适用于该人群。结果显示,双语儿童和单语儿童在测试表现上没有差异。这反驳了双语儿童具有认知优势的观点,并表明在临床应用中不需要为单语和双语儿童制定单独的常模。

相似文献

1
Bilingualism and performance on two widely used developmental neuropsychological test batteries.双语能力与两种广泛使用的发育神经心理测试组合的表现
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 29;10(4):e0125867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125867. eCollection 2015.
2
Language profiles of monolingual and bilingual Finnish preschool children at risk for language impairment.有语言障碍风险的单语和双语芬兰学龄前儿童的语言概况。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008 Nov-Dec;43(6):699-711. doi: 10.1080/13682820701839200.
3
WPPSI-IV and NEPSY-II performance in mono- and bilingual 5-6-year-old children: Findings from The FinSwed Study.WPPSI-IV 和 NEPSY-II 在单语和双语 5-6 岁儿童中的表现:来自 The FinSwed 研究的结果。
Scand J Psychol. 2023 Aug;64(4):409-420. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12895. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
4
A comparison of WPPSI-IV performance between Finland-Swedish minority children and the Scandinavian test norms: Findings from The FinSwed Study.WPPSI-IV 表现比较:芬兰-瑞典少数民族儿童与斯堪的纳维亚测试常模的比较:来自芬兰-瑞典研究的结果。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2023 Dec;29(10):943-952. doi: 10.1017/S1355617723000395. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
5
Comparison of WPPSI-IV and WISC-V cognitive profiles in 6-7-year-old Finland-Swedish children - findings from the FinSwed study.6-7 岁芬兰-瑞典儿童 WPPSI-IV 和 WISC-V 认知图谱的比较-来自 FinSwed 研究的结果。
Child Neuropsychol. 2023 Jul;29(5):687-709. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2022.2112163. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
6
[Effects of Bilingualism on Cognitive Functions in Early Childhood].[双语对幼儿认知功能的影响]
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2018 Jan;67(1):2-17. doi: 10.13109/prkk.2018.67.1.2.
7
Specific language impairment in language-minority children from low-income families.低收入家庭中语言少数群体儿童的特定语言障碍。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Nov;49(6):736-47. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12107. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
8
The joint effects of bilingualism, DLD and item frequency on children's lexical-retrieval performance.双语、语言发育迟缓及项目频率对儿童词汇提取表现的联合影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 May;54(3):485-498. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12454. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
9
To what extent does bilingualism affect children's performance on the NEPSY?
Child Neuropsychol. 2008 Jan;14(1):71-81. doi: 10.1080/09297040701218405.
10
The effect of childhood bilingualism on episodic and semantic memory tasks.童年双语经历对情景记忆和语义记忆任务的影响。
Scand J Psychol. 2008 Apr;49(2):93-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00633.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Language Background and Parental Education on Measures of Cognitive Ability: An Analysis of the WPPSI-IV Cognitive Profiles of Monolingual, Simultaneous Bilingual, and Sequential Bilingual German Children Aged 4 to 7 Years.语言背景和父母教育对认知能力测量的影响:对4至7岁单语、同时双语和顺序双语德国儿童WPPSI-IV认知概况的分析
Children (Basel). 2024 May 24;11(6):631. doi: 10.3390/children11060631.
2
Is there a bilingual advantage in auditory attention among children? A systematic review and meta-analysis of standardized auditory attention tests.儿童在听觉注意力方面是否存在双语优势?标准化听觉注意力测试的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 1;19(5):e0299393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299393. eCollection 2024.
3
The Bilingual Advantage in Children's Executive Functioning Is Not Related to Language Status: A Meta-Analytic Review.双语儿童在执行功能方面的优势与语言状况无关:一项元分析综述。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;32(7):1115-1146. doi: 10.1177/0956797621993108. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
4
Neuropsychological Test Performance Among Native and Non-Native Swedes: Second Language Effects.母语为瑞典语的人和非母语为瑞典语的人在神经心理学测试中的表现:第二语言的影响。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 May 16;37(4):826-838. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acaa043.
5
Is bilingualism losing its advantage? A bibliometric approach.双语能力正在失去其优势吗?一种文献计量学方法。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 20;12(4):e0176151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176151. eCollection 2017.
6
Cognitive profiles in bilingual children born to immigrant parents and Italian monolingual native children with specific learning disorders.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Dec 30;13:109-116. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S121536. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Bilingual Minds.双语思维。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2009 Dec;10(3):89-129. doi: 10.1177/1529100610387084.
2
Cognitive advantage in bilingualism: an example of publication bias?双语认知优势:是否存在发表偏倚?
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;26(1):99-107. doi: 10.1177/0956797614557866. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
3
The Cognitive Development of Young Dual Language Learners: A Critical Review.幼儿双语学习者的认知发展:批判性综述
Early Child Res Q. 2014;29(4):699-714. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.02.003.
4
Is there a bilingual advantage in the ANT task? Evidence from children.在ANT 任务中是否存在双语优势?来自儿童的证据。
Front Psychol. 2014 May 7;5:398. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00398. eCollection 2014.
5
Does language dominance affect cognitive performance in bilinguals? Lifespan evidence from preschoolers through older adults on card sorting, Simon, and metalinguistic tasks.语言优势是否会影响双语者的认知表现?从学前儿童到老年人在卡片分类、西蒙和元语言任务上的寿命证据。
Front Psychol. 2014 Feb 5;5:11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00011. eCollection 2014.
6
The inhibitory advantage in bilingual children revisited: myth or reality?双语儿童的抑制优势再探讨:神话还是现实?
Exp Psychol. 2014;61(3):234-51. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000243.
7
Novel evidence in support of the bilingual advantage: influences of task demands and experience on cognitive control and working memory.支持双语优势的新证据:任务需求和经验对认知控制及工作记忆的影响
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):520-5. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0524-y.
8
There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing.没有连贯的证据表明双语在执行加工方面具有优势。
Cogn Psychol. 2013 Mar;66(2):232-58. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.002. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
9
Working memory development in monolingual and bilingual children.双语儿童和单语儿童的工作记忆发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Feb;114(2):187-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
10
Does simultaneous bilingualism aggravate children's specific language problems?双语会加重儿童的特定语言问题吗?
Acta Paediatr. 2012 Sep;101(9):946-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02733.x. Epub 2012 Jun 7.