• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

母语为瑞典语的人和非母语为瑞典语的人在神经心理学测试中的表现:第二语言的影响。

Neuropsychological Test Performance Among Native and Non-Native Swedes: Second Language Effects.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 May 16;37(4):826-838. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acaa043.

DOI:10.1093/arclin/acaa043
PMID:32722802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9113439/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to study second language effects on neuropsychological (NP) test performance.

METHOD

We administered an NP test battery in Swedish to 322 healthy community dwelling participants, recruited through the Gothenburg Pilot phase of the Swedish CArdioPulmonary BioImage Study (SCAPIS Pilot). All participants were conversationally fluent Swedish speakers (237 native, 85 non-native, mean age 61.1 years). We compared the NP scores of native and non-native participants. We also investigated the influence of (a) age of arrival to Sweden, (b) majority language family of the birth country, and (c) proficiency in Swedish as assessed with a 30 item Boston naming test (BNT).

RESULTS

Native speakers obtained better results on all NP tasks with a verbal component, whereas no significant differences were seen on completely nonverbal tasks (Rey complex figure). For non-native speakers, lower age at arrival to Sweden, arrival from a country where Swedish was also spoken, or arrival from a country with a majority language closer to Swedish, were all linked to better NP scores. Dichotomizing by BNT showed that normally-to-highly proficient non-native speakers obtained better scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Second language effects may contribute to misclassification of non-native speakers. Assumptions of fluency based on short conversations may be misleading. A proficiency assessment with BNT may improve NP score interpretation among non-native speakers.

摘要

目的

我们旨在研究第二语言对神经心理学(NP)测试表现的影响。

方法

我们用瑞典语向通过瑞典心肺生物影像研究(SCAPIS 试点)哥德堡试点阶段招募的 322 名健康社区居民参与者进行了 NP 测试组合。所有参与者都是会话流利的瑞典语使用者(237 名母语者,85 名非母语者,平均年龄 61.1 岁)。我们比较了母语者和非母语者的 NP 分数。我们还研究了(a)抵达瑞典的年龄、(b)出生国的主要语言家族,以及(c)使用 30 项波士顿命名测试(BNT)评估的瑞典语熟练度的影响。

结果

母语者在所有具有语言成分的 NP 任务中都取得了更好的成绩,而在完全非语言任务( Rey 复杂图形)中则没有明显差异。对于非母语者,到达瑞典的年龄越低、来自母语为瑞典语的国家或来自语言与瑞典语更接近的国家,他们的 NP 分数都更好。根据 BNT 进行二分法显示,正常到高度熟练的非母语者获得了更好的成绩。

结论

第二语言的影响可能导致对非母语者的错误分类。基于简短对话的流利假设可能会产生误导。使用 BNT 进行熟练度评估可能会改善非母语者的 NP 分数解释。

相似文献

1
Neuropsychological Test Performance Among Native and Non-Native Swedes: Second Language Effects.母语为瑞典语的人和非母语为瑞典语的人在神经心理学测试中的表现:第二语言的影响。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 May 16;37(4):826-838. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acaa043.
2
Assessment of Naming in Non-native English Speakers with Epilepsy.评估非以英语为母语的癫痫患者的命名能力。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018 Nov;24(10):1057-1063. doi: 10.1017/S1355617718000632. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
3
The Boston Naming Test in Swedish: normative data.瑞典语版波士顿命名测试:常模数据。
Brain Lang. 2005 Jul;94(1):19-31. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.11.004. Epub 2005 Jan 7.
4
Emotional and Non-Emotional Verbal Fluency in Native and Non-Native Speakers.本族语者和非本族语者的情绪和非情绪言语流畅性。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Jan 17;37(1):199-209. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acab031.
5
Demographically-adjusted norms for selected tests of verbal fluency: Results from the Neuropsychological Norms for the US-Mexico Border Region in Spanish (NP-NUMBRS) project.言语流畅性测试的人口统计学调整常模:来自美国-墨西哥边境地区西班牙语神经心理标准(NP-NUMBRS)项目的结果。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2021 Feb;35(2):269-292. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2020.1762931. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
6
Performance on the Boston Naming Test in Bilinguals.双语者在波士顿命名测试中的表现。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2016 Mar;22(3):350-63. doi: 10.1017/S135561771500123X. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
7
The 15-item version of the Boston Naming Test as an index of English proficiency.作为英语水平指标的波士顿命名测试15项版本。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Jan;31(1):168-178. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2016.1224392. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
8
Neuropsychological performance of native versus non-native English speakers.母语为英语的人和非母语为英语的人的神经心理学表现。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012 Nov;27(7):749-55. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acs082. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
9
Pain assessment in native and non-native language: difficulties in reporting the affective dimensions of pain.母语和非母语环境下的疼痛评估:疼痛情感维度报告中的困难。
Scand J Pain. 2018 Oct 25;18(4):575-580. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0043.
10
Performance Differences Between Native and Non-Native Speakers on a New Happy-Sad Executive Function Measure.非英语母语者和英语母语者在新的快乐-悲伤执行功能测量中的表现差异。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2021 Aug 31;36(6):965-975. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acaa124.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Available Normative Data on Neuropsychological Tests for Spanish Speakers in the U.S., Latin America and the Caribbean, and Spain.对美国、拉丁美洲和加勒比地区以及西班牙的西班牙语使用者神经心理测试现有常模数据的系统评价。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.1007/s11065-025-09666-6.
2
Second language learning in older adults modulates Stroop task performance and brain activation.老年人学习第二语言会调节斯特鲁普任务表现和大脑激活。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Aug 7;16:1398015. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1398015. eCollection 2024.
3
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Swedish Version of the Multicultural Cognitive Examination for Cognitive Assessment in Swedish Memory Clinics.

本文引用的文献

1
When your heart is in your mouth: the effect of second language use on negative emotions.当你的心提到嗓子眼儿:第二语言使用对负面情绪的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2019 Sep;33(6):1284-1290. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1540403. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
2
Monitoring speech production and comprehension: Where is the second-language delay?监测言语产出与理解:第二语言延迟出现在哪里?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Jul;72(7):1601-1619. doi: 10.1177/1747021818807447. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
3
Validation of a European Cross-Cultural Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB) for evaluation of dementia.
《用于瑞典记忆诊所认知评估的瑞典版多元认知测验的诊断准确性》。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;97(2):715-726. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230998.
4
Cognitive decline assessment in speakers of understudied languages.对研究较少语言使用者的认知衰退评估。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2023 Nov 7;9(4):e12432. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12432. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
5
Cognitive Assessment in Culturally, Linguistically, and Educationally Diverse Older Populations in Europe.认知评估在文化、语言和教育多样化的欧洲老年人群体中。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2022 Jan-Dec;37:15333175221117006. doi: 10.1177/15333175221117006.
验证一种用于痴呆评估的欧洲跨文化神经心理测试组合(CNTB)。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;34(1):144-152. doi: 10.1002/gps.5002. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
4
Revisiting the bilingual lexical deficit: The impact of age of acquisition.重新审视双语词汇缺陷:习得年龄的影响。
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:45-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
5
A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers.第二语言习得的关键期:来自 200 万英语使用者的证据。
Cognition. 2018 Aug;177:263-277. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 May 2.
6
Child first language and adult second language are both tied to general-purpose learning systems.儿童的第一语言和成人的第二语言都与通用学习系统有关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 13;115(7):1487-1492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1713975115. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
7
Foreign Languages Sound Fast: Evidence from Implicit Rate Normalization.外语听起来语速快:来自内隐语速归一化的证据。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 28;8:1063. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01063. eCollection 2017.
8
The bilingual adaptation: How minds accommodate experience.双语适应:心智如何适应经验。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Mar;143(3):233-262. doi: 10.1037/bul0000099.
9
The 15-item version of the Boston Naming Test as an index of English proficiency.作为英语水平指标的波士顿命名测试15项版本。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Jan;31(1):168-178. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2016.1224392. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
10
Bilingual Minds.双语思维。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2009 Dec;10(3):89-129. doi: 10.1177/1529100610387084.