Lacasse Anaïs, Ware Mark A, Bourgault Patricia, Lanctôt Hélène, Dorais Marc, Boulanger Aline, Cloutier Christian, Shir Yoram, Choinière Manon
*Département des sciences de la santé, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda †Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) ‡The Alan Edward Pain Management Unit, McGill University Health Centre #Clinique de la douleur, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) **Département d'anesthésiologie, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal §Ecole des sciences infirmières, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke ∥Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS) ††Clinique de la douleur, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), Sherbrooke ¶StatSciences Inc., Notre-Dame-de-l'Île-Perrot, QC, Canada.
Clin J Pain. 2016 Feb;32(2):95-102. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000248.
The validity of studies conducted with patient registries depends on the accuracy of the self-reported clinical data. As of now, studies about the validity of self-reported use of analgesics among chronic pain (CP) populations are scarce. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of self-reported prescribed analgesic medication use. This was attained by comparing the data collected in the Quebec Pain Registry (QPR) database to those contained in the Quebec administrative prescription claims database (Régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec [RAMQ]).
To achieve the linkage between the QPR and the RAMQ databases, the first 1285 patients who were consecutively enrolled in the QPR between October 31, 2008 and January 27, 2010 were contacted by mail and invited to participate in a study in which they had to provide their unique RAMQ health insurance number. Using RAMQ prescription claims as the reference standard, κ coefficients, sensitivity, specificity, and their respective 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each therapeutic class of prescribed analgesic drugs that the participants reported taking currently and in the past 12 months.
A total of 569 QPR patients responded to the postal mailing, provided their unique health insurance number, and gave informed consent for the linkage (response proportion=44%). Complete RAMQ prescription claims over the 12 months before patient enrollment into the QPR were available for 272 patients, who constituted our validated study population. Regarding current self-reported prescribed analgesic use, κ coefficients measuring agreement between the 2 sources of information ranged from 0.66 to 0.78 for COX-2-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, skeletal muscle relaxants, synthetic cannabinoids, opiate agonists/partial agonists/antagonists, and antimigraine agents therapeutic classes. For the past 12-month self-reported prescribed analgesic use, QPR patients were less accurate regarding anticonvulsants (κ=0.59), opiate agonists/partial agonists/antagonists (κ=0.57), and antimigraine agents use (κ=0.39).
Information about current prescribed analgesic medication use as reported by CP patients was accurate for the main therapeutic drug classes used in CP management. Accuracy of the past year self-reported prescribed analgesic use was somewhat lower but only for certain classes of medication, the concordance being good on all the others.
使用患者登记处进行的研究的有效性取决于自我报告的临床数据的准确性。目前,关于慢性疼痛(CP)人群中自我报告的镇痛药使用有效性的研究很少。本研究的目的是评估自我报告的处方镇痛药使用情况的准确性。这是通过将魁北克疼痛登记处(QPR)数据库中收集的数据与魁北克行政处方索赔数据库(魁北克医疗保险局[RAMQ])中包含的数据进行比较来实现的。
为了实现QPR和RAMQ数据库之间的关联,通过邮件联系了2008年10月31日至2010年1月27日期间连续纳入QPR的前1285名患者,并邀请他们参与一项研究,在该研究中他们必须提供其唯一的RAMQ健康保险号码。以RAMQ处方索赔作为参考标准,为参与者报告的当前和过去12个月服用的每种处方镇痛药治疗类别计算κ系数、敏感性、特异性及其各自的95%置信区间。
共有569名QPR患者回复了邮政邮件,提供了他们唯一的健康保险号码,并同意进行关联(回复率=44%)。在272名患者中可获得患者纳入QPR前12个月的完整RAMQ处方索赔,这些患者构成了我们的验证研究人群。关于当前自我报告的处方镇痛药使用情况,对于COX-2选择性非甾体抗炎药、抗惊厥药、抗抑郁药、骨骼肌松弛剂、合成大麻素、阿片类激动剂/部分激动剂/拮抗剂和抗偏头痛药物治疗类别,衡量两种信息来源之间一致性的κ系数范围为0.66至0.78。对于过去12个月自我报告的处方镇痛药使用情况,QPR患者在抗惊厥药(κ=0.59)、阿片类激动剂/部分激动剂/拮抗剂(κ=0.57)和抗偏头痛药物使用(κ=0.39)方面的准确性较低。
CP患者报告的当前处方镇痛药使用信息对于CP管理中使用的主要治疗药物类别是准确的。过去一年自我报告的处方镇痛药使用情况的准确性略低,但仅针对某些药物类别,其他所有药物类别的一致性良好。