Horimatsu Takahiro, Sano Yasushi, Tanaka Shinji, Kawamura Takuji, Saito Shoichi, Iwatate Mineo, Oka Shiro, Uno Koji, Yoshimura Kenichi, Ishikawa Hideki, Muto Manabu, Tajiri Hisao
Department of Therapeutic Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin Sakyo, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan,
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jul;30(7):947-54. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2230-x. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
Previous studies have yielded conflicting results on the colonic polyp detection rate with narrow-band imaging (NBI) compared with white-light imaging (WLI). We compared the mean number of colonic polyps detected per patient for NBI versus WLI using a next-generation NBI system (EVIS LUCERA ELITE; Olympus Medical Systems) used with standard-definition (SD) colonoscopy and wide-angle (WA) colonoscopy.
this study is a 2 × 2 factorial, prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial.
this study was conducted at five academic centers in Japan.
patients were allocated to one of four groups: (1) WLI with SD colonoscopy (H260AZI), (2) NBI with SD colonoscopy (H260AZI), (3) WLI with WA colonoscopy (CF-HQ290), and (4) NBI with WA colonoscopy (CF-HQ290).
the mean numbers of polyps detected per patient were compared between the four groups: WLI with/without WA colonoscopy and NBI with/without WA colonoscopy.
Of the 454 patients recruited, 431 patients were enrolled. The total numbers of polyps detected by WLI with SD, NBI with SD, WLI with WA, and NBI with WA were 164, 176, 188, and 241, respectively. The mean number of polyps detected per patient was significantly higher in the NBI group than in the WLI group (2.01 vs 1.56; P = 0.032). The rate was not higher in the WA group than in the SD group (1.97 vs 1.61; P = 0.089).
Although WA colonoscopy did not improve the polyp detection, next-generation NBI colonoscopy represents a significant improvement in the detection of colonic polyps.
既往研究对于窄带成像(NBI)与白光成像(WLI)相比在结肠息肉检出率方面的结果存在冲突。我们使用与标准清晰度(SD)结肠镜检查和广角(WA)结肠镜检查配套的新一代NBI系统(EVIS LUCERA ELITE;奥林巴斯医疗系统公司),比较了NBI与WLI每组患者结肠息肉的平均检出数量。
本研究为2×2析因、前瞻性、多中心随机对照试验。
本研究在日本的五个学术中心开展。
患者被分配至四组之一:(1)SD结肠镜检查白光成像(H260AZI);(2)SD结肠镜检查窄带成像(H260AZI);(3)WA结肠镜检查白光成像(CF-HQ290);(4)WA结肠镜检查窄带成像(CF-HQ290)。
比较四组之间每组患者的息肉平均检出数量:有/无WA结肠镜检查的WLI以及有/无WA结肠镜检查的NBI。
在招募的454例患者中,431例患者被纳入研究。SD白光成像、SD窄带成像、WA白光成像和WA窄带成像检测到的息肉总数分别为164、176、188和241。NBI组患者的息肉平均检出数量显著高于WLI组(2.01对1.56;P = 0.032)。WA组的检出率并不高于SD组(1.97对1.61;P = 0.089)。
虽然WA结肠镜检查并未提高息肉检出率,但新一代NBI结肠镜检查在结肠息肉检测方面有显著改善。