Bergmann Lothar, Kube Ulrich, Doehn Christian, Steiner Thomas, Goebell Peter J, Kindler Manfred, Herrmann Edwin, Janssen Jan, Weikert Steffen, Scheffler Michael T, Schmitz Joerg, Albrecht Michael, Staehler Michael
Medical Clinic II, J. W., Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt/Main, 60590, Germany.
Private Practice for Urology, Goethestrasse 5, 09119, Chemnitz, Germany.
BMC Cancer. 2015 Apr 18;15:303. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1309-7.
Data are limited regarding routine use of everolimus after initial vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy. The aim of this prospective, noninterventional, observational study was to assess efficacy and safety of everolimus after initial VEGF-targeted treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in routine clinical settings.
Everolimus was administered per routine clinical practice. Patients with mRCC of any histology from 116 active sites in Germany were included. The main objective was to determine everolimus efficacy in time to progression (TTP). Progression-free survival (PFS), treatment duration, tumor response, adherence to everolimus regimen, treatment after everolimus, and safety were also assessed.
In the total population (N = 334), median follow-up was 5.2 months (range, 0-32 months). Median treatment duration (safety population, n = 318) was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5-8 months). Median TTP and median PFS were similar in populations investigated. In patients who received everolimus as second-line treatment (n = 211), median (95% CI) TTP was 7.1 months (5-9 months) and median PFS was 6.9 months (5-9 months). Commonly reported adverse events (safety population, n = 318) were dyspnea (17%), anemia (15%), and fatigue (12%). Limitations of the noninterventional design should be considered.
This study reflects routine clinical use of everolimus in a large sample of patients with mRCC. Favorable efficacy and safety were seen for everolimus after previous therapy with one VEGF-targeted agent. Results of this study confirm everolimus as one of the standard options in second-line therapy for patients with mRCC. Novartis study code, CRAD001LD27: VFA registry for noninterventional studies ( http://www.vfa.de/de/forschung/nisdb/).
关于初始血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)靶向治疗后依维莫司的常规使用,数据有限。这项前瞻性、非干预性、观察性研究的目的是评估在常规临床环境中,转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者初始VEGF靶向治疗后依维莫司的疗效和安全性。
依维莫司按照常规临床实践给药。纳入了来自德国116个活跃地点的任何组织学类型的mRCC患者。主要目标是确定依维莫司至疾病进展时间(TTP)的疗效。还评估了无进展生存期(PFS)、治疗持续时间、肿瘤反应、依维莫司治疗方案的依从性、依维莫司治疗后的治疗情况以及安全性。
在总人群(N = 334)中,中位随访时间为5.2个月(范围,0 - 32个月)。中位治疗持续时间(安全人群,n = 318)为6.5个月(95%置信区间[CI],5 - 8个月)。在研究的人群中,中位TTP和中位PFS相似。在接受依维莫司作为二线治疗的患者(n = 211)中,中位(95% CI)TTP为7.1个月(5 - 9个月),中位PFS为6.9个月(5 - 9个月)。常见的不良事件(安全人群,n = 318)包括呼吸困难(17%)、贫血(15%)和疲劳(12%)。应考虑非干预性设计的局限性。
本研究反映了依维莫司在大量mRCC患者中的常规临床应用。在先前用一种VEGF靶向药物治疗后,依维莫司显示出良好的疗效和安全性。本研究结果证实依维莫司是mRCC患者二线治疗的标准选择之一。诺华研究代码,CRAD001LD27:非干预性研究VFA注册(http://www.vfa.de/de/forschung/nisdb/)。