Gillick Muriel R
J Med Ethics. 2015 Sep;41(9):785-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102618. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
Shared decision-making is widely accepted as the gold standard of clinical care. Numerous obstacles to achieving shared decision-making have been identified, including patient factors, physician factors and systemic factors. Until now, the paradigm is seldom successfully implemented in clinical practice, raising questions about the practicality of the process recommended for its use. A re-engineered model is proposed in which physicians elicit and prioritise patients' goals of care and then help translate those goals into treatment options, after clarifying the patient's underlying health status. Preliminary evidence suggests that each step of this revised process is feasible and that patients and physicians are comfortable with this strategy. Adoption of this model, after further testing, would allow the goal of shared decision-making to be realised.
共同决策被广泛认为是临床护理的黄金标准。人们已经发现了实现共同决策的诸多障碍,包括患者因素、医生因素和系统因素。到目前为止,这种模式在临床实践中很少能成功实施,这引发了对于推荐使用的该流程实用性的质疑。本文提出了一种重新设计的模式,即医生先引出患者的护理目标并确定其优先级,然后在明确患者的基础健康状况后,帮助将这些目标转化为治疗方案。初步证据表明,这一修订流程的每一步都是可行的,患者和医生也对这一策略感到满意。经过进一步测试后采用该模式,将能够实现共同决策的目标。