Suppr超能文献

使用对话工具(iDECIDE)改善肺癌决策:一项阶梯楔形实用临床试验。

Improving lung cancer decision-making using a conversation tool (iDECIDE): a stepped wedge pragmatic clinical trial.

作者信息

Disher Natalie, Dieckmann Nathan F, Case James R, Rubim Felipe, Eden Karen B, Golden Sara E, Matlock Daniel D, Coleman Clifford, Lyons Karen S, Saha Somnath, Slatore Christopher G, Vranas Kelly C, Sullivan Donald R

机构信息

Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System (VAPORHCS), Portland, OR, USA.

Division of Psychology, School of Medicine, OHSU, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

Future Oncol. 2025 Apr;21(9):1045-1056. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2475733. Epub 2025 Mar 18.

Abstract

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. However, few treatment decision-making resources exist. In this study, we evaluate a low literacy lung cancer treatment conversation tool to enhance shared decision-making (SDM). The Improving Decision-Making Encounters in Lung Cancer (iDECIDE) pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial evaluates the effectiveness of a conversation tool for patients with lung cancer. Our primary outcome is SDM, a multifaceted outcome consisting of decisional conflict (DCS), decision self-efficacy (DSES), satisfaction with communication (COMRADE), and assessment of lung cancer knowledge. SDM is assessed 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after patients' treatment decision-making encounter. Each measure within the primary outcome will be assessed separately. We began recruiting patients in 2022 from four health care centers and will conduct outcome assessments at four timepoints over 6 months. We aim to recruit 230 patients by 2025. We seek to address the gaps in NSCLC decision-making support using an innovative trial design to determine whether our conversation tool improves SDM and other patient-centered outcomes.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05407168 (clinicaltrials.gov).

摘要

肺癌是癌症相关死亡的主要原因。然而,现有的治疗决策资源很少。在本研究中,我们评估了一种低识字率肺癌治疗对话工具,以加强共同决策(SDM)。改善肺癌决策交流(iDECIDE)实用、阶梯式楔形整群随机试验评估了一种针对肺癌患者的对话工具的有效性。我们的主要结局是共同决策,这是一个多方面的结局,包括决策冲突(DCS)、决策自我效能感(DSES)、沟通满意度(COMRADE)以及肺癌知识评估。在患者进行治疗决策交流后2周、3个月和6个月评估共同决策。主要结局中的每项指标将单独评估。我们于2022年开始从四个医疗中心招募患者,并将在6个月内的四个时间点进行结局评估。我们的目标是到2025年招募230名患者。我们试图通过一种创新的试验设计来填补非小细胞肺癌决策支持方面的空白,以确定我们的对话工具是否能改善共同决策和其他以患者为中心的结局。临床试验注册:NCT05407168(clinicaltrials.gov)。

相似文献

5
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
6
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.

本文引用的文献

10
Lung Cancer Screening: Review and 2021 Update.肺癌筛查:综述与2021年更新
Curr Pulmonol Rep. 2022;11(1):15-28. doi: 10.1007/s13665-021-00283-1. Epub 2022 Apr 2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验