Suppr超能文献

尼泊尔西部卡斯凯地区的注射实践:社区视角

Injection practice in Kaski district, Western Nepal: a community perspective.

作者信息

Gyawali Sudesh, Rathore Devendra Singh, Shankar Pathiyil Ravi, Kumar Vikash K C, Maskey Manisha, Jha Nisha

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.

Department of Pharmacy, L.R. Institute of Pharmacy, Jabli-kyar, Solan, India.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 29;15:435. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1775-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that unsafe injection practice is a major public health problem in Nepal but did not quantify the problem. The present community-based study was planned to: 1) quantify injection usage, 2) identify injection providers, 3) explore differences, if any, in injection usage and injection providers, and 4) study and compare people's knowledge and perception about injections between the urban and rural areas of Kaski district.

METHODS

A descriptive, cross-sectional mixed-methods study was conducted from July to November 2012, using a questionnaire based survey and focus group discussions (FGDs). A semi-structured questionnaire advocated by the World Health Organization was modified and administered to household heads and injection receivers in selected households and the FGDs were conducted using a topic guide. The district was divided into urban and rural areas and 300 households from each area were selected. Twenty FGDs were held.

RESULTS

In 218 households (36.33%) [99 in urban and 119 in rural] one or more members received at least one injection. During the three month recall period, 258 subjects (10.44%) reported receiving injection(s) with a median of two injections. The average number of injections per person per year was calculated to be 2.37. Health care workers (34.8%), staff of medical dispensaries (37.7%), physicians (25.2%), and traditional healers (2.3%) were consulted by the respondents for their basic health care needs and for injections. Compared to urban respondents, more rural respondents preferred injections for fever (p < 0.001). People preferred injections due to injections being perceived by them as being powerful, fast-acting, and longer lasting than oral pills. More than 82% of respondents were aware of, and named, at least one disease transmitted by using unsterile syringes during injection administration or when syringes are shared between people.

CONCLUSIONS

Less preference for injections and high awareness about the association between injections and injection-borne infections among the general population is encouraging for safe injection practice. However, respondents were not aware of the importance of having qualified injection providers for safe injections and were receiving injections from unqualified personnel.

摘要

背景

以往研究表明,不安全注射行为是尼泊尔一个主要的公共卫生问题,但未对该问题进行量化。本次基于社区的研究旨在:1)量化注射使用情况;2)确定注射服务提供者;3)探讨注射使用情况和注射服务提供者之间是否存在差异;4)研究并比较卡斯奇地区城乡居民对注射的知识和认知。

方法

2012年7月至11月开展了一项描述性横断面混合方法研究,采用基于问卷的调查和焦点小组讨论(FGD)。对世界卫生组织倡导的半结构化问卷进行修改,并向选定家庭的户主和注射接受者发放,焦点小组讨论使用主题指南进行。该地区分为城市和农村地区,每个地区选取300户家庭。共举行了20次焦点小组讨论。

结果

在218户家庭(36.33%)[城市99户,农村119户]中,有一名或多名成员接受了至少一次注射。在三个月的回忆期内,258名受试者(10.44%)报告接受了注射,中位数为两次注射。计算得出每人每年的平均注射次数为2.37次。受访者为满足基本医疗需求和接受注射咨询的对象有医护人员(34.8%)、医务室工作人员(37.7%)、医生(25.2%)和传统治疗师(2.3%)。与城市受访者相比,更多农村受访者在发烧时更倾向于注射(p < 0.001)。人们之所以更喜欢注射,是因为他们认为注射比口服药药效更强、起效更快、作用更持久。超过82%的受访者知晓并说出了至少一种在注射给药时使用未消毒注射器或注射器共用会传播的疾病。

结论

普通人群对注射的偏好较低,且对注射与注射传播感染之间的关联有较高认知,这对安全注射行为而言是令人鼓舞的。然而,受访者并未意识到有合格注射服务提供者对安全注射的重要性,且正在从不合格人员处接受注射。

相似文献

7

本文引用的文献

1
Injection practices in India.印度的注射操作
WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2012 Apr-Jun;1(2):189-200. doi: 10.4103/2224-3151.206931.
7
Factors affecting the prescribing patterns of antibiotics and injections.影响抗生素和注射剂处方模式的因素。
J Korean Med Sci. 2012 Feb;27(2):120-7. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.2.120. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
9
The qualitative content analysis process.定性内容分析过程。
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验