• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家肺癌筛查试验中的种族差异。对广泛实施的影响。

Racial Differences in Outcomes within the National Lung Screening Trial. Implications for Widespread Implementation.

机构信息

1 Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Hospital, Charleston, South Carolina; and.

2 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Jul 15;192(2):200-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201502-0259OC.

DOI:10.1164/rccm.201502-0259OC
PMID:25928649
Abstract

RATIONALE

Black individuals with lung cancer (LC) experience higher mortality because they present with more advanced disease and are less likely to undergo curative resection for early-stage disease. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) demonstrated improved LC mortality by screening high-risk patients with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). The benefit of LDCT screening in black individuals is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

Examine results of the NLST by race.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a randomized trial (NCT00047385) performed in 33 U.S. centers.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Overall and lung cancer-specific mortality were measured. Screening with LDCT reduced LC mortality in all racial groups but more so in black individuals (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61 vs. 0.86). Smoking increased the likelihood of death from LC, and when stratified by race black smokers were twice as likely to die as white smokers (HR, 4.10 vs. 2.25). Adjusting for sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics, black individuals experienced higher all-cause mortality than white individuals (HR, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.49); however, black individuals screened with LDCT had a reduction in all-cause mortality. Black individuals were younger, were more likely to be current smokers, had more comorbidities, and had fewer years of formal education than white individuals (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Black individuals screened with LDCT had decreased mortality from lung cancer. However, the demographics associated with improved LC survival were less commonly found in black individuals. The overall mortality in the NLST was higher for black individuals than white individuals, but improved in black individuals screened, suggesting that this subgroup may have had improved access to care. To realize the reductions in mortality from LC screening, dissemination efforts need to be tailored to meet the needs of this community.

摘要

背景

肺癌(LC)患者的死亡率较高,这是因为他们的病情更为晚期,且早期疾病接受根治性切除术的可能性较低。国家肺癌筛查试验(NLST)通过对高危患者进行低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查,证实了 LC 死亡率的降低。但 LDCT 筛查在黑人中的获益尚不清楚。

目的

按种族分析 NLST 的结果。

方法

这是在美国 33 个中心进行的一项随机试验(NCT00047385)的二次分析。

测量和主要结果

总体和肺癌特异性死亡率。LDCT 筛查降低了所有种族组的 LC 死亡率,但对黑人的降低更为显著(风险比 [HR],0.61 对 0.86)。吸烟增加了肺癌死亡的可能性,且按种族分层时,黑人吸烟者死于肺癌的可能性是白人吸烟者的两倍(HR,4.10 对 2.25)。调整社会人口统计学和行为特征后,黑人的全因死亡率高于白人(HR,1.35;95%置信区间,1.22-1.49);然而,接受 LDCT 筛查的黑人全因死亡率降低。黑人比白人更年轻、更可能是当前吸烟者、合并症更多、受正规教育年限更少(P < 0.05)。

结论

接受 LDCT 筛查的黑人肺癌死亡率降低。然而,与改善 LC 生存相关的人口统计学特征在黑人中较少见。NLST 中黑人的总体死亡率高于白人,但接受筛查的黑人死亡率有所改善,这表明这一亚组可能获得了更好的医疗服务。为了实现 LC 筛查死亡率的降低,传播工作需要根据该社区的需求进行调整。

相似文献

1
Racial Differences in Outcomes within the National Lung Screening Trial. Implications for Widespread Implementation.国家肺癌筛查试验中的种族差异。对广泛实施的影响。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Jul 15;192(2):200-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201502-0259OC.
2
Association of Inclusion of More Black Individuals in Lung Cancer Screening With Reduced Mortality.纳入更多黑人个体进行肺癌筛查与降低死亡率相关。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2119629. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19629.
3
Racial disparities in eligibility for low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening among older adults with a history of smoking.有吸烟史的老年人在低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查资格方面的种族差异。
Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Mar;30(3):235-240. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1092-2. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
4
5
The Association between Smoking Abstinence and Mortality in the National Lung Screening Trial.《全国肺癌筛查试验中戒烟与死亡率的关系》。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Mar 1;193(5):534-41. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201507-1420OC.
6
Lung cancer mortality reduction by LDCT screening-Results from the randomized German LUSI trial.低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查降低肺癌死亡率-来自德国 LUSI 随机试验的结果。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Mar 15;146(6):1503-1513. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32486. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
7
Racial Differences in Smoking-related Disease Risk Perceptions Among Adults Completing Lung Cancer Screening: Follow-up Results from the ACRIN/NLST Ancillary Study.在接受肺癌筛查的成年人中,与吸烟相关的疾病风险认知的种族差异:ACRIN/NLST 辅助研究的随访结果。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019 Aug;6(4):676-685. doi: 10.1007/s40615-019-00566-z. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
8
Evaluating Potential Racial Inequities in Low-dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer.评估低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查肺癌中的潜在种族不平等。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2020 Apr;112(2):209-214. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2019.10.002. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
9
Overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer.低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查肺癌中的过度诊断。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Feb 1;174(2):269-74. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12738.
10
Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.用低剂量计算机断层扫描进行肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):971-987. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0377.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating lung cancer screening disparities in an integrated healthcare system: barriers and opportunities.评估综合医疗保健系统中的肺癌筛查差异:障碍与机遇
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 22;15:1601458. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1601458. eCollection 2025.
2
Lessons Learned From International Lung Cancer Screening Trials; People at Risk Deserve Screening for Early Detection.从国际肺癌筛查试验中吸取的经验教训;高危人群值得进行筛查以实现早期发现。
Respirology. 2025 Sep;30(9):802-816. doi: 10.1111/resp.70097. Epub 2025 Aug 14.
3
Molecular Diagnosis, Clinical Trial Representation, and Precision Medicine in Minority Patients with Oncogene-Driven Lung Cancer.
分子诊断、临床试验表征与癌基因驱动肺癌少数族裔患者的精准医学
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 11;17(12):1950. doi: 10.3390/cancers17121950.
4
Novel Platforms of Education to Engage Black and African Americans in Lung Cancer Screening.让黑人和非裔美国人参与肺癌筛查的新型教育平台。
AJPM Focus. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):100350. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2025.100350. eCollection 2025 Aug.
5
Black US military veterans respond favourably to a booklet using narratives to normalise shared decision-making.美国黑人退伍军人对一本使用故事使共同决策常态化的手册反应良好。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2025 Mar 23;9:100606. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100606. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Application and evaluation of NCCN guidelines in health education for lung nodule screening: A perspective.NCCN指南在肺结节筛查健康教育中的应用与评价:一种观点
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Mar 14;104(11):e41798. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041798.
7
Implementing a Tribally Engaged Lung Cancer Screening Pilot Program in Rural Oklahoma.在俄克拉荷马州农村地区实施部落参与的肺癌筛查试点项目。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2025 Jul 1;18(7):423-430. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0348.
8
Lung Cancer Screening and Incidental Findings: A Research Agenda: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.肺癌筛查与偶然发现:一项研究议程:美国胸科学会官方研究声明
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Mar;211(3):436-451. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202501-0011ST.
9
Optimal Pathways to Lung Cancer Screening in Primary Care Settings: A Scoping Review.基层医疗环境中肺癌筛查的最佳途径:一项范围综述
Curr Oncol. 2024 Dec 26;32(1):8. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32010008.
10
Rethinking how mobile units can catalyze progress on lung cancer screening: a scoping review of what we have learned.重新思考移动单位如何推动肺癌筛查进展:对我们所学知识的范围综述
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Oct 31;16(10):7143-7154. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-846. Epub 2024 Oct 30.