Suppr超能文献

评估综合医疗保健系统中的肺癌筛查差异:障碍与机遇

Evaluating lung cancer screening disparities in an integrated healthcare system: barriers and opportunities.

作者信息

Javier Carmen, Jiang Sheng-Fang, Philippe Jenna, Arana Isabel, Velotta Jeffrey B

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Pleasanton, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 22;15:1601458. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1601458. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

RATIONALE

The national average rate of lung cancer screening (LCS) has remained low at roughly 6%, with California's rate among the lowest at 1% compared to all fifty states.

METHODS

We enrolled Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) patients eligible for LCS per the USPSTF guidelines published in 2013 and 2021, respectively. Annual and overall rates of completed initial low-dose computed tomography of chest (LDCT) were computed from February 2015 to February 2022. Chi-squared tests and multivariable Cox regression assessed the impact of sociodemographic factors.

RESULTS

The average annual completion rate of initial lung cancer screening over the entire study period was 0.95% per the 2013 USPSTF guidelines. In the year 2022, only 0.69% of all eligible study participants per the 2021 USPSTF guidelines completed lung cancer screening. Chi-squared tests demonstrated differences in the overall proportion of individuals screened across the entire study period stratified by sex and race/ethnicity respectively (2013 USPSTF guidelines; 4.72% Males, 4.29% Females, p = 0.09 for the sex categories and Asian 4.31%, African American 3.89%, Hispanic 3.79%, Other 3.48%, Non-Hispanic White 4.79%, p = 0.02 for the race/ethnicity categories. Multivariate time-to-completion analyses demonstrated statistically significant associations for younger age groups (50-60: HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.21-1.64, p < 0.0001, 61-70: HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.68-2.27, p < 0.0001), male sex (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.28, p = 0.0009), and all non-White racial/ethnic groups (Asian: HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.86, p = 0.0002, African American: HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53-0.78, p < 0.0001, Hispanic: HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.55-0.80, p < 0.0001, Other: HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.93, p = 0.0086). Neighborhood Deprivation Index (NDI) quartiles were not significantly associated with initial LDCT completion (HRs 0.93 to 1.04; all p-values > 0.3).

CONCLUSION

This average annual rate of LCS at KPNC was comparable to the statewide average in California. Age 61-70 years old, male sex, and non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity were the strongest and most statistically significant predictors of initial LDCT completion. NDI was not associated with screening uptake. No significant improvement in screening uptake was observed within the first year following the release of the 2021 USPSTF guidelines on LCS.

摘要

理论依据

全国肺癌筛查(LCS)的平均比率一直很低,约为6%,与所有50个州相比,加利福尼亚州的比率最低,为1%。

方法

我们纳入了分别符合2013年和2021年发布的美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)指南中LCS条件的北加利福尼亚州凯撒医疗机构(KPNC)的患者。计算了2015年2月至2022年2月期间完成首次胸部低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)的年度和总体比率。卡方检验和多变量Cox回归评估了社会人口统计学因素的影响。

结果

根据2013年USPSTF指南,在整个研究期间,首次肺癌筛查的平均年度完成率为0.95%。在2022年,根据2021年USPSTF指南,所有符合条件的研究参与者中只有0.69%完成了肺癌筛查。卡方检验表明,在整个研究期间,按性别和种族/族裔分层的筛查个体总体比例存在差异(2013年USPSTF指南;男性4.72%,女性4.29%,性别类别p = 0.09;亚洲人4.31%,非裔美国人3.89%,西班牙裔3.79%,其他3.48%,非西班牙裔白人4.79%,种族/族裔类别p = 0.02)。多变量完成时间分析表明,较年轻年龄组(50 - 60岁:风险比[HR] 1.41,95%置信区间[CI] 1.21 - 1.64,p < 0.0001;61 - 70岁:HR 1.95,95% CI 1.68 - 2.27,p < 0.0001)、男性(HR 1.17,95% CI 1.07 - 1.28,p = 0.0009)以及所有非白人种族/族裔群体(亚洲人:HR 0.73,95% CI 0.62 - 0.86,p = 0.0002;非裔美国人:HR 0.64,95% CI 0.53 - 0.78,p < 0.0001;西班牙裔:HR 0.66,95% CI 0.55 - 0.80,p < 0.0001;其他:HR 0.75,95% CI 0.60 - 0.93,p = 0.0086)之间存在统计学上的显著关联。邻里剥夺指数(NDI)四分位数与首次LDCT完成情况无显著关联(HR为0.93至1.04;所有p值> 0.3)。

结论

KPNC的LCS平均年度比率与加利福尼亚州的全州平均水平相当。61 - 70岁、男性以及非西班牙裔白人种族/族裔是首次LDCT完成的最强且在统计学上最显著的预测因素。NDI与筛查接受情况无关。在2021年USPSTF发布LCS指南后的第一年,未观察到筛查接受情况有显著改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f1e/12411495/0a9059be8e09/fonc-15-1601458-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验