• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期乳腺癌年轻女性的局部治疗决策与对侧预防性乳房切除术

Local Therapy Decision-Making and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Young Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

作者信息

Rosenberg Shoshana M, Sepucha Karen, Ruddy Kathryn J, Tamimi Rulla M, Gelber Shari, Meyer Meghan E, Schapira Lidia, Come Steven E, Borges Virginia F, Golshan Mehra, Winer Eric P, Partridge Ann H

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;22(12):3809-15. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4572-6. Epub 2015 May 1.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-015-4572-6
PMID:25930247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4598267/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) have increased in the United States, with younger women with breast cancer the most likely to have CPM.

METHODS

As part of an ongoing cohort study of young women diagnosed with breast cancer at age ≤40 years, we conducted multinomial logistic regression of data from 560 women with unilateral Stage I-III disease to identify factors associated with: (1) CPM versus unilateral mastectomy (UM); (2) CPM versus breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 37 years; 66 % of women indicated that their doctor said that BCS was an option or was recommended. Of all women, 42.9 % had CPM, 26.8 % UM, and 30.4 % BCS. Among women who said the surgical decision was patient-driven, 59.9 % had CPM, 22.8 % BCS, and 17.3 % UM. Clinical characteristics associated with CPM versus BCS included HER2 positivity, nodal involvement, larger tumor size, lower BMI, parity, and testing positive for a BRCA mutation. Emotional and decisional factors associated with CPM versus UM and BCS included anxiety, less fear of recurrence, and reporting a patient-driven decision. Women who reported a physician-driven decision were less likely to have had CPM than both of the other surgeries, whereas higher confidence with the decision was associated with having CPM versus BCS.

CONCLUSIONS

Many young women with early-stage breast cancer are choosing CPM. The association between CPM and emotional and decisional factors suggest that improved communication together with better psychosocial support may improve the decision-making process.

摘要

背景

在美国,对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)的比例有所上升,患有乳腺癌的年轻女性最有可能接受CPM。

方法

作为一项正在进行的对年龄≤40岁被诊断为乳腺癌的年轻女性队列研究的一部分,我们对560名单侧I - III期疾病女性的数据进行了多项逻辑回归分析,以确定与以下情况相关的因素:(1)CPM与单侧乳房切除术(UM);(2)CPM与保乳手术(BCS)。

结果

诊断时的中位年龄为37岁;66%的女性表示她们的医生说过BCS是一种选择或被推荐。在所有女性中,42.9%接受了CPM,26.8%接受了UM,30.4%接受了BCS。在表示手术决策由患者主导的女性中,59.9%接受了CPM,22.8%接受了BCS,17.3%接受了UM。与CPM和BCS相关的临床特征包括HER2阳性、淋巴结受累、肿瘤尺寸较大、BMI较低、生育情况以及BRCA突变检测呈阳性。与CPM和UM以及BCS相关的情感和决策因素包括焦虑、对复发的恐惧较小以及报告决策由患者主导。报告决策由医生主导的女性接受CPM的可能性低于其他两种手术,而对决策的更高信心与接受CPM而非BCS相关。

结论

许多早期乳腺癌的年轻女性正在选择CPM。CPM与情感和决策因素之间的关联表明,改善沟通以及更好的心理社会支持可能会改善决策过程。

相似文献

1
Local Therapy Decision-Making and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Young Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌年轻女性的局部治疗决策与对侧预防性乳房切除术
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;22(12):3809-15. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4572-6. Epub 2015 May 1.
2
'Taking control of cancer': understanding women's choice for mastectomy.“掌控癌症”:理解女性选择乳房切除术的原因
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb;22(2):383-91. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4033-7. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
3
Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decisions in a Population-Based Sample of Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌患者基于人群样本的对侧预防性乳房切除术决策
JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):274-282. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4749.
4
Predictors for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in breast cancer patients.乳腺癌患者对侧预防性乳房切除术的预测因素。
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015 Apr 1;8(4):3748-64. eCollection 2015.
5
Decision making and factors influencing long-term satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy in women with breast cancer.乳腺癌女性预防性乳房切除术的决策制定及影响长期满意度的因素。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr;38(2):179-83. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318292f8a7.
6
Social and Clinical Determinants of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.对侧预防性乳房切除术的社会和临床决定因素
JAMA Surg. 2014 Jun;149(6):582-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5689.
7
Patient and surgeon characteristics associated with increased use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients with breast cancer.与乳腺癌患者对侧预防性乳房切除术使用增加相关的患者及外科医生特征。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Oct;16(10):2697-704. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0641-z. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
8
Active Participation in Decision-Making in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy for Patients With Breast Cancer.主动参与乳腺癌患者对侧预防性乳房切除术的决策。
J Surg Res. 2019 Oct;242:129-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.037. Epub 2019 May 7.
9
Women's preferences for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy following unilateral breast cancer: What risk-reduction makes it worthwhile?单侧乳腺癌患者对双侧预防性乳房切除术的偏好:何种风险降低程度使其值得进行?
Breast. 2017 Feb;31:233-240. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.025. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
10
Psychosocial factors associated with the uptake of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among BRCA1/2 mutation noncarriers with newly diagnosed breast cancer.在新诊断为乳腺癌的BRCA1/2基因未携带者中,与对侧预防性乳房切除术接受情况相关的心理社会因素。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Apr;162(2):297-306. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4123-x. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Breast Cancer Information Grand Round for Survivorship (BIG-S) prospective cohort.乳腺癌幸存者信息大查房前瞻性队列研究(BIG-S)
Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1007/s10654-025-01262-5.
2
Clinical outcomes and aesthetic results of reverse sequence endoscopic versus traditional bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction-an analysis of initial 116 patients from single institution.逆行序贯内镜手术与传统双侧保留乳头乳晕皮下腺体切除加即刻乳房假体植入重建的临床疗效及美学效果——单中心116例患者的初步分析
Front Oncol. 2025 Mar 10;15:1496592. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1496592. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer.全国范围内早期乳腺癌乳房切除术的趋势。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Jan;150(1):9-16. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2895.
2
Survival outcomes after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: a decision analysis.对侧预防性乳房切除术的生存结局:决策分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Jul 16;106(8). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju160. Print 2014 Aug.
3
Social and Clinical Determinants of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.对侧预防性乳房切除术的社会和临床决定因素
Enhancing Aesthetics in Bilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: the Role of Tissue Pre-Expansion.
增强双侧腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建的美学效果:组织预扩张的作用
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 May;49(9):2459-2466. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04610-0. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
4
Emotional Reactivity and Regulation Relate to Surgical Treatment Decision Making Among Newly Diagnosed Women With Breast Cancer.情绪反应性与调节能力与新诊断乳腺癌女性的手术治疗决策相关。
Cancer Med. 2024 Dec;13(23):e70357. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70357.
5
Impact of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy on survival outcomes in patients with unilateral breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.对侧预防性乳房切除术对单侧乳腺癌患者生存结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Sep;40(8):1873-1881. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.8.9708.
6
Comprehensive Young Age Breast Cancer registry from clinical, genomics, and patient-reported outcomes measured with 15 years follow-up: the CHARM cohort profile.CHARM 队列研究:15 年随访的临床、基因组学和患者报告结局综合年轻乳腺癌登记资料。
Breast Cancer. 2024 May;31(3):467-475. doi: 10.1007/s12282-024-01559-5. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
7
Breast Cancer Genes and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: Beyond BRCA.乳腺癌基因与对侧预防性乳房切除术:超越BRCA基因
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;30(12):6958-6959. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14161-4. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
8
Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decision-Making: The Partners' Perspective.对侧预防性乳房切除术决策:伴侣的视角。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(10):6268-6274. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14022-0. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
9
Current Considerations in Surgical Treatment for Adolescents and Young Women with Breast Cancer.青少年及年轻女性乳腺癌外科治疗的当前考量
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 15;10(12):2542. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122542.
10
Clinicopathologic Features, Treatment Patterns, and Disease Outcomes in a Modern, Prospective Cohort of Young Women Diagnosed with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.在一个现代、前瞻性的年轻女性导管原位癌患者队列中,临床病理特征、治疗模式和疾病结局。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(13):8048-8057. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12361-y. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
JAMA Surg. 2014 Jun;149(6):582-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5689.
4
Impact of bilateral versus unilateral mastectomy on short term outcomes and adjuvant therapy, 2003-2010: a report from the National Cancer Data Base.2003 - 2010年双侧与单侧乳房切除术对短期预后及辅助治疗的影响:来自国家癌症数据库的报告
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;21(9):2920-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3687-5. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
5
Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey.年轻乳腺癌女性对预防性对侧乳房切除术的认知、知识和满意度:一项横断面调查。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Sep 17;159(6):373-81. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-6-201309170-00003.
6
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer: addressing peace of mind.乳腺癌的对侧预防性乳房切除术:解决心理负担
JAMA. 2013 Aug 28;310(8):793-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.101055.
7
Operative risks associated with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: a single institution experience.与对侧预防性乳房切除术相关的手术风险:单机构经验。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;20(13):4113-20. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3108-1. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
8
Complications and morbidity following breast reconstruction--a review of 16,063 cases from the 2005-2010 NSQIP datasets.乳房重建后的并发症与发病率——基于2005 - 2010年国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据集的16063例病例回顾
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014 Apr;48(2):104-14. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2013.819003. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
9
Increased postoperative complications in bilateral mastectomy patients compared to unilateral mastectomy: an analysis of the NSQIP database.双侧乳房切除术患者的术后并发症发生率高于单侧乳房切除术:对 NSQIP 数据库的分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(10):3212-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3116-1. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
10
Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy in sporadic breast cancer.散发性乳腺癌的对侧预防性乳房切除术。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):e262-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70047-0.