Fehse Kai, Maikowski Lea, Simmank Fabian, Gutyrchik Evgeny, Meissner Karin
Human Science Center.
Institute of Medical Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Germany.
Pain Med. 2015 Oct;16(10):1967-74. doi: 10.1111/pme.12783. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
We studied the expectation effects associated with brands by labeling placebo interventions (original and generic analgesic) and investigating the potential differences in efficacy between the two placebos in dealing with noxious heat pain, as well as exploring the neurometabolic correlates of the placebo response.
We applied a two by two design with two identical placebo interventions that differed only in their labeling. One group was told that they received 500 mg of "Aspirin" (original brand) while the other group was told that they received a popular ASA generic (1A Pharma). After establishing the individual pain level of each subject, we measured pain intensities behaviorally before and after the intervention and looked for corresponding brain areas with increased hemodynamic response using functional magnetic resonance imaging.
At the behavioral level, we found decreases in pain intensity from baseline to the intervention condition with the original brand only. At the neuronal level, we specifically observed activations of the anterior insulae under the baseline conditions, complemented by activations of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex after the interventions. A direct comparison of the two placebo conditions revealed higher values of activation for the bilateral dorsolateral (as well as dorsomedial) prefrontal cortex for the original brand.
Our data indicate a behavioral placebo response for the original brand only. Expectations by subjects appear to be triggered not only by the placebo treatment itself but also by the trusted brand, which thus serves as an enhanced placebo. Both processes appear to be based on fronto-cortical neural networks, as these areas showed significantly stronger activations with the original brand.
我们通过对安慰剂干预措施(原品牌和通用型镇痛药)进行标记,研究与品牌相关的期望效应,调查两种安慰剂在处理有害热痛方面疗效的潜在差异,并探索安慰剂反应的神经代谢相关性。
我们采用二乘二设计,使用两种仅标签不同的相同安慰剂干预措施。一组被告知他们接受了500毫克的“阿司匹林”(原品牌),而另一组被告知他们接受了一种流行的阿司匹林通用型药物(1A制药公司)。在确定每个受试者的个体疼痛水平后,我们在干预前后通过行为测量疼痛强度,并使用功能磁共振成像寻找血流动力学反应增加的相应脑区。
在行为水平上,我们发现只有原品牌的情况下,从基线到干预状态疼痛强度降低。在神经元水平上,我们特别观察到在基线条件下前脑岛的激活,干预后背内侧前额叶皮质也有激活。两种安慰剂条件的直接比较显示,原品牌的双侧背外侧(以及背内侧)前额叶皮质的激活值更高。
我们的数据表明只有原品牌存在行为安慰剂反应。受试者的期望似乎不仅由安慰剂治疗本身触发,还由受信任的品牌触发,因此品牌起到了增强安慰剂的作用。这两个过程似乎都基于额叶皮质神经网络,因为这些区域在原品牌的情况下显示出明显更强的激活。