Hansen E, Zech N, Meissner K
Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland.
Fachbereich Gesundheitsförderung, Hochschule Coburg, Coburg, Deutschland.
Internist (Berl). 2017 Oct;58(10):1102-1110. doi: 10.1007/s00108-017-0294-0.
The expectations of patients enhance the probability of their occurrence and are thereby the main triggers for inducing placebo and nocebo responses. Strong placebo effects are not only regularly observed in pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical sham treatment in placebo controlled studies but also make a considerable contribution to any real treatment. The accompanying words are essential to ensure maximum impact of drugs and other forms of treatment. They should contain positive expressions instead of negations. Such a strengthening of drug therapy by placebo effects is more important than the widespread use of placebos that remains a problem because of the obligation to provide information and effective therapy and because of inherently induced side effects. Any false comments about symptoms or side effects can aggravate or induce them. Nocebo effects are not imagined but real symptoms that can definitely be harmful. They constitute a considerable proportion of the side effects requiring treatment. Awareness and knowledge is needed to prevent or neutralize them. Nocebo effects are avoidable when risk information is always directly combined with positive aspects, such as the expected benefits of the treatment or the prophylactic measures and therapeutic options for side effects. Existing negative expectations are disrupted by providing more alternative options and by leaving negative experiences in the past where they belong. Placebo and nocebo effects are strongly sensitive to the context. They are dependent on the experiences and conceptions of the individual patient, as well as on the physician-patient relationship. The latter can provide the best protection against harm from risk disclosure. In addition, the expectations of patients and their consequences are strongly affected by the expectations of the treating doctor, by fellow patients, the media and society.
患者的期望会增加这些情况发生的可能性,因此是诱发安慰剂和反安慰剂反应的主要触发因素。在安慰剂对照研究中,不仅在药物和非药物假治疗中经常观察到强烈的安慰剂效应,而且其对任何实际治疗都有相当大的贡献。伴随的言语对于确保药物和其他治疗形式的最大效果至关重要。言语应包含肯定表述而非否定表述。通过安慰剂效应强化药物治疗比广泛使用安慰剂更为重要,因为存在提供信息和有效治疗的义务以及固有诱发的副作用,广泛使用安慰剂仍然是一个问题。任何关于症状或副作用的虚假评论都可能加重或诱发它们。反安慰剂效应并非想象出来的,而是确实可能有害的真实症状。它们在需要治疗的副作用中占相当大的比例。需要有认识和知识来预防或抵消它们。当风险信息始终直接与积极方面相结合时,例如治疗的预期益处或副作用的预防措施和治疗选择,反安慰剂效应是可以避免的。通过提供更多替代选择以及将负面经历抛在脑后,可以打破现有的负面期望。安慰剂和反安慰剂效应对背景非常敏感。它们取决于个体患者的经历和观念,以及医患关系。后者可以提供最佳保护,防止因风险披露而造成伤害。此外,患者的期望及其后果会受到主治医生、其他患者、媒体和社会期望的强烈影响。