Jabbarvand Mahmoud, Hashemian Hesam, Khodaparast Mehdi, Rafatnejad Amin, Beheshtnejad Amirhooshang, Salami Amir
*Ophthalmology Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran; and †Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Cornea. 2015 Jul;34(7):768-72. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000425.
To evaluate and compare the ocular surface condition in herpetic interstitial stromal keratitis and neurotrophic ulcer groups and their normal fellow eyes.
In this observational, cross-sectional case-control study, 85 consecutive patients were included, including 56 cases of treated herpetic interstitial keratitis and 29 patients with neurotrophic ulcers. Fifty-six age- and sex-matched participants were also recruited from a normal population as the control group. We evaluated and scored the subjective and objective measures of dry eye for both eyes of all patients. Then, we compared the score of the groups with one another and also with the control group. The main outcome measures were the discomfort level, visual symptoms of dry eye, conjunctival injection, conjunctival staining, corneal staining, corneal tear signs of dry eye, meibomian gland dysfunction, tear break-up time, Schirmer test score with anesthesia, and tear osmolarity.
The normal fellow eye of the herpetic keratitis group had significantly higher discomfort levels (1.4 ± 0.9 vs. 1.3 ± 0.5, P = 0.003), visual symptoms (1.7 ± 0.8 vs. 1.3 ± 0.7, P = 0.002), tear break-up time (8.3 ± 3.2 vs. 12.1 ± 3.3 seconds, P = 0.003), Schirmer test scores (9.2 ± 3.9 vs. 12.9 ± 3 mm, P = 0.04), and tear osmolarity (9.2 ± 3.9 vs. 12.9 ± 3 mm, P = 0.003) in comparison with normal controls. The normal fellow eyes of the neurotrophic ulcer group had significantly worse values for discomfort level (1.9 ± 0.9 vs. 1.3 ± 0.5, P < 0.001), tear break-up time (7.9 ± 4 vs. 12.1 ± 3.3, P = 0.004), Schirmer test score (8.1 ± 3.9 vs. 12.9 ± 3, P = 0.005), and tear osmolarity (295 ± 9.2 vs. 292.7 ± 5.9, P = 0.02) compared with normal controls.
Both eyes of patients with neurotrophic ulcer and interstitial herpetic keratitis have a significantly poorer ocular surface condition compared with that of normal controls.
评估并比较疱疹性基质性角膜炎和神经营养性溃疡组及其对侧正常眼的眼表状况。
在这项观察性横断面病例对照研究中,纳入了85例连续患者,包括56例接受治疗的疱疹性基质性角膜炎患者和29例神经营养性溃疡患者。还从正常人群中招募了56名年龄和性别匹配的参与者作为对照组。我们对所有患者双眼的干眼主观和客观指标进行了评估和评分。然后,我们将各研究组的评分相互比较,并与对照组进行比较。主要观察指标包括不适程度、干眼的视觉症状、结膜充血、结膜染色、角膜染色、干眼的角膜泪液体征、睑板腺功能障碍、泪膜破裂时间、表面麻醉下的泪液分泌试验评分以及泪液渗透压。
与正常对照组相比,疱疹性角膜炎组的对侧正常眼在不适程度(1.4±0.9 vs. 1.3±0.5,P = 0.003)、视觉症状(1.7±0.8 vs. 1.3±0.7,P = 0.002)、泪膜破裂时间(8.3±3.2 vs. 12.1±3.3秒,P = 0.003)、泪液分泌试验评分(9.2±3.9 vs. 12.9±3 mm,P = 0.04)和泪液渗透压(9.2±3.9 vs. 12.9±3 mm,P = 0.003)方面均显著更高。与正常对照组相比,神经营养性溃疡组的对侧正常眼在不适程度(1.9±0.9 vs. 1.3±0.5,P < 0.001)、泪膜破裂时间(7.9±4 vs. 12.1±3.3,P = 0.004)、泪液分泌试验评分(8.1±3.9 vs. 12.9±3,P = 0.005)和泪液渗透压(295±9.2 vs. 292.7±5.9,P = 0.02)方面均显著更差。
与正常对照组相比,神经营养性溃疡和疱疹性基质性角膜炎患者的双眼眼表状况均明显更差。