Quinze-Vingts National Ophthalmology Hospital, Paris, France; French National Institute of Health and Medical Research, UPMC University Paris, Institut de la Vision, CNRS, Paris, France; Clinical Center for Investigations, Paris, France.
Quinze-Vingts National Ophthalmology Hospital, Paris, France.
Ophthalmology. 2015 Apr;122(4):669-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
To compare small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus LASIK for post-refractive dry eye disease.
Prospective, comparative, nonrandomized clinical study.
Thirty patients scheduled for bilateral myopic SMILE and 30 age-, sex-, and refraction-matched patients scheduled for bilateral myopic LASIK were enrolled and followed for 6 months after the surgery.
Complete evaluation of dry eye disease was performed at 1 and 6 months postoperatively, which included vision-related quality of life (Ocular Surface Disease Index [OSDI]), clinical examinations (tear film breakup time [TBUT], Schirmer I test, corneal staining), and tear osmolarity measurements, together with an overall severity score. Function and morphology of the corneal innervation were evaluated by corneal esthesiometry and subbasal nerve imaging using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM).
Overall analysis of dry eye disease and corneal innervation.
High incidence of mild to moderate dry eye disease was observed in both groups 1 month postoperatively, which remained significantly higher in the LASIK group than in the SMILE group 6 months after surgery (overall severity score [0-4]: 1.2±1.1 vs. 0.2±0.4, respectively, P < 0.01), leading to more frequent use of tear substitutes over the long term. Corneal sensitivity was better in SMILE than in LASIK eyes 1 month postoperatively (3.5±1.79 vs. 2.45±2.48, respectively, P < 0.01) and then recovered to statistically similar values at 6 months. Corneal nerve density, number of long fibers, and branchings as assessed by IVCM were significantly higher in the SMILE group compared with the LASIK group 1 and 6 months after surgery. Corneal sensitivity was negatively correlated with dry eye-related corneal damage (R² = 0.48, P < 0.01), and the long fiber nerve density was independently correlated with the OSDI score (R² = 0.50, P < 0.01) and the Schirmer test (R² = 0.21, P < 0.01) 6 months postoperatively.
The SMILE procedure has a less pronounced impact on the ocular surface and corneal innervation compared with LASIK, further reducing the incidence of dry eye disease and subsequent degradation in quality of life after refractive surgery.
比较小切口微透镜提取术(SMILE)与 LASIK 治疗屈光性干眼症的效果。
前瞻性、对照、非随机临床研究。
30 例计划行双侧近视 SMILE 术和 30 例年龄、性别和屈光度匹配的计划行双侧近视 LASIK 术患者被纳入并在术后 6 个月内随访。
术后 1 个月和 6 个月时进行完整的干眼症评估,包括与视觉相关的生活质量(眼表疾病指数[OSDI])、临床检查(泪膜破裂时间[TBUT]、泪液分泌试验、角膜染色)和泪液渗透压测量,以及总体严重程度评分。通过角膜知觉测量和使用共聚焦显微镜(IVCM)的角膜下神经成像评估角膜神经功能和形态。
干眼症和角膜神经的总体分析。
两组术后 1 个月均出现较高比例的轻至中度干眼症,且 LASIK 组术后 6 个月仍显著高于 SMILE 组(总体严重程度评分[0-4]:1.2±1.1 比 0.2±0.4,P<0.01),导致长期更频繁地使用人工泪液。SMILE 术后 1 个月时角膜敏感性优于 LASIK 眼(3.5±1.79 比 2.45±2.48,P<0.01),然后在 6 个月时恢复到统计学上相似的水平。SMILE 术后 1 个月和 6 个月时,IVCM 评估的角膜神经密度、长纤维数量和分支明显高于 LASIK 组。角膜敏感性与干眼症相关的角膜损伤呈负相关(R²=0.48,P<0.01),长纤维神经密度与 OSDI 评分(R²=0.50,P<0.01)和 Schirmer 试验(R²=0.21,P<0.01)在术后 6 个月时呈独立相关。
与 LASIK 相比,SMILE 手术对眼表和角膜神经的影响较小,进一步降低了屈光手术后干眼症的发生率和生活质量的下降。