Khera Nandita
College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Blood Rev. 2015 Nov;29(6):351-7. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 19.
Clinical practice in the field of blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) has evolved over time, as a result of thousands of basic and clinical research studies. While it appears that scientific discovery and adaptive clinical research may be well integrated in case of BMT, there is lack of sufficient literature to definitively understand the process of translation of evidence to practice and if it may be selective . In this review, examples from BMT and other areas of medicine are used to highlight the state of and potential barriers to evidence uptake. Strategies to help improve knowledge transfer are discussed and the role of existing framework provided by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry (CIBMTR) to monitor uptake and BMT Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) to enhance translation of evidence into practice is highlighted.
由于数千项基础和临床研究,血液与骨髓移植(BMT)领域的临床实践随着时间的推移而不断发展。虽然在BMT领域,科学发现与适应性临床研究似乎得到了很好的整合,但缺乏足够的文献来确切了解证据转化为实践的过程以及这一过程是否具有选择性。在本综述中,我们使用了BMT和其他医学领域的例子来突出证据采纳的现状和潜在障碍。我们讨论了有助于改善知识转移的策略,并强调了国际血液与骨髓移植登记中心(CIBMTR)提供的现有框架在监测采纳情况方面的作用,以及骨髓移植临床试验网络(BMT CTN)在促进证据转化为实践方面的作用。