• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声刀零缺血技术辅助下的保留肾单位手术:一项初步研究

Partial nephrectomy driven by cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator under zero ischemia: a pilot study.

作者信息

Weibl Peter, Shariat Shahrokh F, Klatte Tobias

机构信息

Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2015 Dec;33(12):2015-21. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1569-5. Epub 2015 May 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-015-1569-5
PMID:25935329
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and technical applicability of cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA)-driven zero-ischemia open partial nephrectomy in patients with renal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively collected data of 13 consecutive patients, who underwent open partial nephrectomy under non-ischemic conditions. Tumor resection was done using an ultrasonic device (CUSA/SONOCA 300). Demographic and laboratory data, tumor characteristics, perioperative, and postoperative variables were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median age was 60.0 years (range 40-76); body mass index 28.0 kg/m(2) (range 22.9-43.3); tumor size 37.0 mm (range 11-110 mm). Patient were stratified according to the PADUA score into low- (score 6-7; n - 4), intermediate- (score 8-9; n - 5), and high-risk (score of >10; n - 4) groups, and the median score was 9.0 (range 6-13; SD +2.3). The vast majority of kidney tumors were diagnosed incidentally (n - 11; 84.6 %). Median operative time was 175 min (55-270 min); median time of tumor extirpation was 12 min (6-25 min); and median blood loss was 250 ml. Serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, and hemoglobin were nearly unaltered before and after surgery in 11 cases (84.6 %). Three patients received a blood transfusion (Clavien-Dindo Grade II); one had Grade IIIa complication (insertion of double J stent without general anesthesia); and three had Grade IIIb complications (insertion of double J under general anesthesia).

CONCLUSIONS

The ultrasonic device demonstrated acceptable hemostatic and resection properties during open partial nephrectomy without ischemia. Our series showed promising perioperative and postoperative outcomes that may help in maximizing preservation of renal function in partial nephrectomy candidates.

摘要

目的

探讨超声外科吸引器(CUSA)驱动的零缺血开放性肾部分切除术在肾肿瘤患者中的疗效及技术适用性。

材料与方法

我们前瞻性收集了13例连续接受非缺血条件下开放性肾部分切除术患者的数据。使用超声设备(CUSA/SONOCA 300)进行肿瘤切除。评估人口统计学和实验室数据、肿瘤特征、围手术期及术后变量。

结果

中位年龄为60.0岁(范围40 - 76岁);体重指数为28.0 kg/m²(范围22.9 - 43.3);肿瘤大小为37.0 mm(范围11 - 110 mm)。根据PADUA评分将患者分为低风险组(评分6 - 7;n = 4)、中风险组(评分8 - 9;n = 5)和高风险组(评分>10;n = 4),中位评分为9.0(范围6 - 13;标准差±2.3)。绝大多数肾肿瘤为偶然发现(n = 11;84.6%)。中位手术时间为175分钟(55 - 270分钟);中位肿瘤切除时间为12分钟(6 - 25分钟);中位失血量为250毫升。11例患者(84.6%)术后血清肌酐、肾小球滤过率和血红蛋白几乎未发生改变。3例患者接受了输血(Clavien - Dindo二级);1例发生Ⅲa级并发症(未行全身麻醉置入双J支架);3例发生Ⅲb级并发症(全身麻醉下置入双J支架)。

结论

超声设备在无缺血的开放性肾部分切除术中显示出可接受的止血和切除性能。我们的系列研究显示了良好的围手术期和术后结果,这可能有助于在候选肾部分切除术患者中最大程度地保留肾功能。

相似文献

1
Partial nephrectomy driven by cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator under zero ischemia: a pilot study.超声刀零缺血技术辅助下的保留肾单位手术:一项初步研究
World J Urol. 2015 Dec;33(12):2015-21. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1569-5. Epub 2015 May 3.
2
Zero ischemia anatomical partial nephrectomy: a novel approach.零缺血解剖性部分肾切除术:一种新方法。
J Urol. 2012 Mar;187(3):807-14. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.146. Epub 2012 Jan 15.
3
Perioperative and renal functional outcomes of elective robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for renal tumours with high surgical complexity.高手术复杂度肾肿瘤的择期机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)的围手术期和肾功能结果。
BJU Int. 2014 Dec;114(6):903-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.12751. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
4
Laparoendoscopic single-site partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional outcome analysis.腹腔镜单部位部分肾切除术:多机构结果分析。
Eur Urol. 2013 Aug;64(2):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.025. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
5
Clampless laparoendoscopic single-site partial nephrectomy for renal cancer with low PADUA score: technique and surgical outcomes.无夹腹腔镜单部位部分肾切除术治疗低 PADUA 评分肾癌:技术与手术结果。
BJU Int. 2013 Jun;111(7):1091-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11601.x. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
6
Gasless laparoendoscopic single-port clampless sutureless partial nephrectomy for peripheral renal tumors: perioperative outcomes.无气腹腹腔镜单孔无夹无缝合肾部分切除术治疗肾周肿瘤的围手术期结果
Int J Urol. 2015 Apr;22(4):349-55. doi: 10.1111/iju.12687. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
7
'Zero ischaemia', sutureless laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumours with a low nephrometry score.无缺血技术,针对低肾脏评分肿瘤的腹腔镜部分肾切除术,免缝合。
BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(1):124-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10782.x. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
8
Factors affecting renal function after open partial nephrectomy-a comparison of clampless and clamped warm ischemic technique.开放部分肾切除术对肾功能的影响因素 - 无夹闭与夹闭温热缺血技术的比较。
Urology. 2012 Oct;80(4):865-70. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.079. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
9
Zero-ischaemia robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) for hilar tumours.无缺血机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RPN)治疗肾门肿瘤。
BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(6 Pt 2):948-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10552.x.
10
Zero ischemia laparoscopic partial nephrectomy after superselective transarterial tumor embolization for tumors with moderate nephrometry score: long-term results of a single-center experience.超选择性肾动脉肿瘤栓塞后零缺血腹腔镜部分肾切除术治疗中等肾肿瘤评分的肿瘤:单中心经验的长期结果。
J Endourol. 2011 Sep;25(9):1443-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0684. Epub 2011 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Two reports of iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms intraoperatively induced by an ultrasonic surgical aspirator: A rare intraoperative complication.两例超声手术吸引器术中诱发医源性假性动脉瘤的报告:一种罕见的术中并发症。
Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Jul 19;15:251. doi: 10.25259/SNI_1015_2023. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of off-clamp microwave scissors-based sutureless partial nephrectomy versus on-clamp conventional partial nephrectomy in a canine model.犬模型中基于脱夹微波剪刀的无缝合部分肾切除术与夹闭传统部分肾切除术的比较。
Front Surg. 2023 Sep 19;10:1255929. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1255929. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Open mini-flank partial nephrectomy: an essential contemporary operation.开放性微创侧腹部分肾切除术:一项重要的当代手术。
Korean J Urol. 2014 Sep;55(9):557-67. doi: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.9.557. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
2
Methods of haemostasis during liver resection--a UK national survey.肝切除术中止血方法——英国全国性调查。
Dig Surg. 2013;30(4-6):375-82. doi: 10.1159/000354036. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
3
Zero-ischemia minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.零缺血微创部分肾切除术。
Curr Urol Rep. 2013 Oct;14(5):465-70. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0359-0.
4
Thulium laser supported nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma.铥激光辅助保留肾单位手术治疗肾细胞癌。
J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):698-701. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.079. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
5
Zero ischemia laparoscopic partial thulium laser nephrectomy.零缺血腹腔镜铥激光部分肾切除术。
J Endourol. 2013 Nov;27(11):1366-70. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0527. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
6
Factors affecting renal function after open partial nephrectomy-a comparison of clampless and clamped warm ischemic technique.开放部分肾切除术对肾功能的影响因素 - 无夹闭与夹闭温热缺血技术的比较。
Urology. 2012 Oct;80(4):865-70. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.079. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
7
Renal function after partial nephrectomy: effect of warm ischemia relative to quantity and quality of preserved kidney.部分肾切除术后的肾功能:热缺血相对于保肾的数量和质量的影响。
Urology. 2012 Feb;79(2):356-60. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.031.
8
Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery.用于保留肾单位手术候选患者的肾肿瘤解剖(PADUA)分类的术前方面和尺寸。
Eur Urol. 2009 Nov;56(5):786-93. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.040. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
9
Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors.1800例腹腔镜与开放部分肾切除术治疗单一肾肿瘤的比较。
J Urol. 2007 Jul;178(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.038. Epub 2007 May 11.
10
Open partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney: experience with 400 cases.孤立肾肿瘤的开放性部分肾切除术:400例经验
J Urol. 2006 May;175(5):1630-3; discussion 1633. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00991-2.