Lunoe Maren M, Drendel Amy L, Levas Michael N, Weisman Steven J, Dasgupta Mahua, Hoffmann Raymond G, Brousseau David C
Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;66(5):466-74. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
The J-Tip (National Medical Products Inc, Irvine, CA) uses air instead of a needle to push lidocaine into the skin. To our knowledge, no studies have investigated its use for venipuncture in young children. We determine whether the J-Tip decreased venipuncture pain in young children compared with vapocoolant spray.
Children aged 1 to 6 years were randomized into 3 groups: intervention (J-Tip), control (vapocoolant spray), and sham (vapocoolant spray and pop of an empty J-Tip). The procedure was videotaped and scored with the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) tool at 3 points; baseline, before approach; device, at J-Tip deployment; and at venipuncture. The FLACC tool was scored 0 (none) to 10 (severe). Comparisons of pain scores over time were made with the generalized estimating equation. Venipuncture success and adverse effects were assessed and compared with χ(2).
Two hundred five children enrolled: intervention 96, control 53, and sham 56. There were no between-group differences in baseline characteristics. There was no mean change in pain scores from device to venipuncture in the intervention group (0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.31 to 0.82), but there was an increase in pain in the control (2.82; 95% CI 1.91 to 3.74) and sham (1.68; 95% CI 0.83 to 2.52) groups. This change was greater for the control and sham compared to the intervention group. There was no difference in venipuncture success between groups. No severe adverse events occurred. Minor adverse events were the same between groups.
Use of the J-Tip for children aged 1 to 6 years reduced venipuncture pain compared with vapocoolant spray or sham treatment.
J-Tip(美国加利福尼亚州欧文市国家医疗产品公司)通过空气而非针头将利多卡因注入皮肤。据我们所知,尚无研究探讨其在幼儿静脉穿刺中的应用。我们确定与挥发性冷却剂喷雾相比,J-Tip是否能减轻幼儿静脉穿刺时的疼痛。
将1至6岁的儿童随机分为3组:干预组(使用J-Tip)、对照组(使用挥发性冷却剂喷雾)和假处理组(使用挥发性冷却剂喷雾并按压空的J-Tip)。对整个操作过程进行录像,并使用面部、腿部、活动、哭闹和安慰度(FLACC)工具在3个时间点进行评分:基线,即操作前;设备使用时,即J-Tip使用时;静脉穿刺时。FLACC工具的评分范围为0(无疼痛)至10(严重疼痛)。使用广义估计方程对不同时间点的疼痛评分进行比较。评估静脉穿刺成功率和不良反应,并使用χ(2)检验进行组间比较。
共纳入205名儿童:干预组96名,对照组53名,假处理组56名。各组基线特征无组间差异。干预组从使用设备到静脉穿刺时疼痛评分无平均变化(0.26;95%置信区间[CI] -0.31至0.82),但对照组(2.82;95% CI 1.91至3.74)和假处理组(1.68;95% CI 0.83至2.52)的疼痛评分增加。与干预组相比,对照组和假处理组的这种变化更大。各组静脉穿刺成功率无差异。未发生严重不良事件。各组轻微不良事件相同。
对于1至6岁的儿童,与挥发性冷却剂喷雾或假处理相比,使用J-Tip可减轻静脉穿刺时的疼痛。