Armitage Christopher J
Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Psychological Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
J Public Health (Oxf). 2015 Sep;37(3):438-44. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv054. Epub 2015 May 1.
Emotional eating is associated with mental health problems and weight gain, but research has focussed on treatment rather than prevention. The present research tests a brief theory-based psychological intervention to reduce and prevent emotional eating in a community sample.
Two hundred and forty women were randomized to a control condition in which they were asked to identify emotional eating triggers and strategies for change (a 'volitional help sheet') or to an experimental condition in which they were asked explicitly to use the volitional help sheet to link emotional eating triggers with strategies for change and so form implementation intentions.
Results showed that eating in response to boredom was more common than eating in response to anxiety or depression. There was a significant condition × time interaction showing that the formation of implementation intentions resulted in significantly lower levels of emotional eating in response to boredom at follow-up (d = 0.29).
The intervention shows promise in reducing and preventing emotional eating, but further research is required to refine the tool and to examine whether eating in response to anxiety or depression is more common among clinical populations.
情绪化进食与心理健康问题及体重增加有关,但研究主要集中在治疗而非预防方面。本研究测试了一种基于简短理论的心理干预措施,以减少和预防社区样本中的情绪化进食。
240名女性被随机分配到一个对照条件组,在该组中她们被要求识别情绪化进食的触发因素和改变策略(一份“自主帮助表”),或者被分配到一个实验条件组,在该组中她们被明确要求使用自主帮助表将情绪化进食的触发因素与改变策略联系起来,从而形成实施意图。
结果表明,因无聊而进食比因焦虑或抑郁而进食更为常见。存在显著的条件×时间交互作用,表明实施意图的形成导致随访时因无聊而产生的情绪化进食水平显著降低(d = 0.29)。
该干预措施在减少和预防情绪化进食方面显示出前景,但需要进一步研究来完善该工具,并检验在临床人群中因焦虑或抑郁而进食是否更为常见。