Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Coupland Street, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
J Behav Med. 2020 Feb;43(1):80-87. doi: 10.1007/s10865-019-00061-0. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
Interventions to change children's behavior typically target adults or children, but rarely both. The aims were to: (a) evaluate acceptability and feasibility of an innovative theory-based intervention designed to change both child and adult behavior, and (b) generate effect sizes for a definitive randomized controlled trial. The oral health of sixty children aged 5-9 years with a repaired cleft lip and/or palate was assessed before randomization to one of three conditions: (a) control group, (b) intervention group in which children and adults were asked to form implementation intentions, or (c) intervention plus booster group in which adults were additionally sent a reminder about the implementation intentions they and their children formed. Oral health assessments were repeated at 6-month follow-up alongside exit interviews. The procedures proved popular and participants exposed to the intervention additionally reported believing that forming implementation intentions was effective. Descriptive statistics generally showed oral health improvements across all conditions, although the effects were more marked in the intervention plus booster condition, where plaque improved by 44.53%, gingivitis improved by 20.00% and free sugar consumption improved by 8.92% (vs. 6.43% improvement, 15.00% deterioration and 15.58% improvement in the control group, respectively). Data collection procedures were acceptable and the intervention feasible. The effect sizes suggest that the intervention plus booster condition has sufficient promise to proceed to a fully-powered randomized controlled trial. The intervention has the potential to be adapted to tackle other child health behaviors and to be deployed at scale.
干预措施通常针对儿童或成年人来改变儿童的行为,但很少同时针对两者。目的是:(a)评估一项创新的基于理论的干预措施的可接受性和可行性,该干预措施旨在改变儿童和成人的行为,(b)为一项确定性的随机对照试验生成效应大小。在将 60 名年龄在 5-9 岁的唇裂和/或腭裂修复儿童随机分配到以下三种条件之一之前,评估了他们的口腔健康状况:(a)对照组,(b)干预组,要求儿童和成人制定实施意图,或(c)干预加助推组,其中成年人还收到了关于他们和孩子制定的实施意图的提醒。在 6 个月的随访和退出访谈中重复了口腔健康评估。这些程序很受欢迎,参与者接触到的干预措施还报告称相信制定实施意图是有效的。总体而言,描述性统计数据显示所有条件下的口腔健康都有所改善,尽管在干预加助推条件下效果更为明显,菌斑改善了 44.53%,牙龈炎改善了 20.00%,游离糖消耗减少了 8.92%(对照组分别改善了 6.43%,恶化了 15.00%,改善了 15.58%)。数据收集程序是可以接受的,干预措施也是可行的。这些效应大小表明,干预加助推条件具有足够的潜力进行完全有效的随机对照试验。该干预措施有可能被改编用于解决其他儿童健康行为问题,并大规模推广。