Lettieri Corrado, Zavalloni Dennis, Rossini Roberta, Morici Nuccia, Ettori Federica, Leonzi Ornella, Latib Azeem, Ferlini Marco, Trabattoni Daniela, Colombo Paola, Galli Mario, Tarantini Giuseppe, Napodano Massimo, Piccaluga Emanuela, Passamonti Enrico, Sganzerla Paolo, Ielasi Alfonso, Coccato Micol, Martinoni Alessandro, Musumeci Giuseppe, Zanini Roberto, Castiglioni Battistina
Department of Cardiology, Ospedale Carlo Poma, Mantova, Italy.
Department of Cardiology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy.
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jul 1;116(1):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.039. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
The optimal management and short- and long-term prognoses of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) remain not well defined. The aim of this observational multicenter study was to assess long-term clinical outcomes in patients with SCAD. In-hospital and long-term outcomes were assessed in 134 patients with documented SCAD, as well as the clinical impact and predictors of a conservative rather than a revascularization strategy of treatment. The mean age was 52 ± 11, years and 81% of patients were female. SCAD presented as an acute coronary syndromes in 93% of patients. A conservative strategy was performed in 58% of patients and revascularization in 42%. On multivariate analysis, distal versus proximal or mid location of dissection (odds ratio 9.27) and basal Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 2 or 3 versus 0 or 1 (odds ratio 0.20) were independent predictors of conservative versus revascularization strategy. A conservative strategy was associated with better in-hospital outcomes compared with revascularization (rates of major adverse cardiac events 3.8% and 16.1%, respectively, p = 0.028); however, no significant differences were observed in the long-term outcomes. In conclusion, in this large observational study of patients with SCAD, angiographic features significantly influenced the treatment strategy, providing an excellent short- and long-term prognosis.
自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)的最佳管理以及短期和长期预后仍未明确界定。这项观察性多中心研究的目的是评估SCAD患者的长期临床结局。对134例有记录的SCAD患者的住院和长期结局进行了评估,同时评估了保守治疗而非血运重建治疗策略的临床影响和预测因素。患者的平均年龄为52±11岁,81%为女性。93%的患者表现为急性冠状动脉综合征。58%的患者采用保守治疗策略,42%采用血运重建治疗。多因素分析显示,夹层远端与近端或中段位置(比值比9.27)以及基础心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)血流分级2或3与0或1(比值比0.20)是保守治疗与血运重建治疗策略的独立预测因素。与血运重建相比,保守治疗策略与更好的住院结局相关(主要不良心脏事件发生率分别为3.8%和16.1%,p = 0.028);然而,长期结局未观察到显著差异。总之,在这项对SCAD患者的大型观察性研究中,血管造影特征显著影响治疗策略,提供了良好的短期和长期预后。