Born Sabine, Kerzel Dirk, Pratt Jay
Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Education, Université de Genève.
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):995-1006. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000058. Epub 2015 May 4.
The contingent attentional capture hypothesis proposes that visual stimuli that do not possess characteristics relevant for the current task will not capture attention, irrespective of their bottom-up saliency. Typically, contingent capture is tested in a spatial cuing paradigm, comparing manual reaction times (RTs) across different conditions. However, attention may act through several mechanisms and RTs may not be ideal to disentangle those different components. In 3 experiments, we examined whether color singleton cues provoke cuing effects in temporal order judgments (TOJs) and whether they would be contingent on attentional control sets. Experiment 1 showed that color singleton cues indeed produce cuing effects in TOJs, even in a cluttered and dynamic target display containing multiple heterogeneous distractors. In Experiment 2, consistent with contingent capture, we observed reliable cuing effects only when the singleton cue matched participants' current attentional control set. Experiment 3 suggests that a sensory interaction account of the differences found in Experiment 2 is unlikely. Our results help to discern the attentional components that may play a role in contingent capture. Further, we discuss a number of other effects (e.g., reversed cuing effects) that are found in RTs, but so far have not been reported in TOJs. Those differences suggest that RTs are influenced by a multitude of mechanisms; however, not all of these mechanisms may affect TOJs. We conclude by highlighting how the study of attentional capture in TOJs provides valuable insights for the attention literature, but also for studies concerned with the perceived timing between stimuli.
偶然注意捕获假说提出,不具备与当前任务相关特征的视觉刺激不会捕获注意力,无论其自下而上的显著性如何。通常,偶然捕获是在空间线索范式中进行测试的,比较不同条件下的手动反应时间(RTs)。然而,注意力可能通过多种机制起作用,反应时间可能并非区分这些不同成分的理想指标。在3个实验中,我们研究了颜色单一提示是否会在时间顺序判断(TOJ)中引发提示效应,以及它们是否会依赖于注意力控制集。实验1表明,即使在包含多个异质干扰物的杂乱动态目标显示中,颜色单一提示确实会在TOJ中产生提示效应。在实验2中,与偶然捕获一致,我们仅在单一提示与参与者当前的注意力控制集匹配时观察到可靠的提示效应。实验3表明,对实验2中发现的差异采用感觉交互作用的解释不太可能成立。我们的结果有助于辨别在偶然捕获中可能起作用的注意力成分。此外,我们讨论了在反应时间中发现的一些其他效应(例如反向提示效应),但迄今为止在时间顺序判断中尚未报道。这些差异表明反应时间受到多种机制的影响;然而,并非所有这些机制都可能影响时间顺序判断。我们最后强调,对时间顺序判断中的注意捕获的研究如何为注意力文献以及与刺激之间感知时间相关的研究提供有价值的见解。