• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

向左戳是为了正确?基于模型的小鼠对时间顺序判断的分析

Poking Left To Be Right? A Model-Based Analysis of Temporal Order Judged by Mice.

作者信息

Tünnermann Jan, Scharlau Ingrid

机构信息

Cognitive Psychology, Paderborn University, Germany1.

出版信息

Adv Cogn Psychol. 2018 Jun 30;14(2):39-50. doi: 10.5709/acp-0237-0. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.5709/acp-0237-0
PMID:32676131
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7354420/
Abstract

The theory of visual attention (TVTVA) provides a formal framework for the assessment of visual attention and related processes. Its center is a mathematical model of visual encoding processes and discretely defined components of attention. Building on this model, TVTVA offers quantitative and process-related explanations for a variety of phenomena in the domain of visual attention. Because the theory relies on very general assumptions which might hold true for other domains of sensory processing, we tested its possible explanatory value for tactile processing in mice. Reanalyzing published data of temporal-order judgments by mice, we show how a TVTVA-based analysis identifies the processes which drive observable behavior and that it comes to conclusions quite different from those of conventional analyses of temporal-order judgments. According to this analysis, despite the same overall capacity dedicated to the task, some mice assume attentional biases toward one side, possibly to optimize their overall performance. We suggest that TVTVA's concepts provide a powerful point of vantage to find explanations for observable behavior where conventional analysis easily leads to dead ends.

摘要

视觉注意理论(TVTVA)为视觉注意及相关过程的评估提供了一个形式化框架。其核心是一个视觉编码过程的数学模型以及离散定义的注意成分。基于此模型,TVTVA对视觉注意领域的各种现象给出了定量的和与过程相关的解释。由于该理论依赖于一些非常普遍的假设,这些假设可能在其他感觉处理领域也成立,我们测试了其对小鼠触觉处理的可能解释价值。通过重新分析已发表的小鼠时间顺序判断数据,我们展示了基于TVTVA的分析如何识别驱动可观察行为的过程,并且它得出的结论与传统的时间顺序判断分析结论截然不同。根据这一分析,尽管用于该任务的总体能力相同,但一些小鼠对一侧存在注意偏向,这可能是为了优化它们的整体表现。我们认为,TVTVA的概念为寻找可观察行为的解释提供了一个有力的有利视角,而传统分析很容易陷入死胡同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/15d40933d91a/acp-14-2-239-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/12b319d18657/acp-14-2-239-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/9afb03d8aa85/acp-14-2-239-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/f9ef61f9ce60/acp-14-2-239-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/32528171ced1/acp-14-2-239-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/7d7261c8cf4d/acp-14-2-239-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/1ff37684b6ff/acp-14-2-239-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/827dbe955116/acp-14-2-239-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/e943cc4d74a5/acp-14-2-239-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/7e5574446925/acp-14-2-239-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/3d08770fb7ba/acp-14-2-239-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/f5af6e41f1d6/acp-14-2-239-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/b896f31b7fac/acp-14-2-239-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/bed1d2005cc4/acp-14-2-239-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/74c9b2ceae60/acp-14-2-239-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/c3eae0a94c15/acp-14-2-239-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/ec20dfc69f1b/acp-14-2-239-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/b4101158fa39/acp-14-2-239-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/15d40933d91a/acp-14-2-239-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/12b319d18657/acp-14-2-239-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/9afb03d8aa85/acp-14-2-239-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/f9ef61f9ce60/acp-14-2-239-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/32528171ced1/acp-14-2-239-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/7d7261c8cf4d/acp-14-2-239-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/1ff37684b6ff/acp-14-2-239-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/827dbe955116/acp-14-2-239-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/e943cc4d74a5/acp-14-2-239-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/7e5574446925/acp-14-2-239-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/3d08770fb7ba/acp-14-2-239-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/f5af6e41f1d6/acp-14-2-239-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/b896f31b7fac/acp-14-2-239-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/bed1d2005cc4/acp-14-2-239-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/74c9b2ceae60/acp-14-2-239-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/c3eae0a94c15/acp-14-2-239-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/ec20dfc69f1b/acp-14-2-239-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/b4101158fa39/acp-14-2-239-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf8/7354420/15d40933d91a/acp-14-2-239-g018.jpg

相似文献

1
Poking Left To Be Right? A Model-Based Analysis of Temporal Order Judged by Mice.向左戳是为了正确?基于模型的小鼠对时间顺序判断的分析
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2018 Jun 30;14(2):39-50. doi: 10.5709/acp-0237-0. eCollection 2018.
2
Using temporal order judgments to investigate attention bias toward pain and threat-related information. Methodological and theoretical issues.运用时间顺序判断来研究对疼痛和威胁相关信息的注意偏向。方法学和理论问题。
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Apr;41:135-8. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
3
Beyond time and space: The effect of a lateralized sustained attention task and brain stimulation on spatial and selective attention.超越时空:一种侧化持续注意力任务和脑刺激对空间和选择性注意力的影响。
Cortex. 2018 Oct;107:131-147. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
4
A dissociation between selective attention and conscious awareness in the representation of temporal order information.时间顺序信息表征中选择性注意与意识觉知之间的分离。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Sep;35:274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
5
The effect of motion on tactile and visual temporal order judgments.运动对触觉和视觉时间顺序判断的影响。
Percept Psychophys. 2003 Jan;65(1):81-94. doi: 10.3758/bf03194785.
6
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments.通过基于模型的时间顺序判断分析来测量注意力和视觉处理速度。
J Vis Exp. 2017 Jan 23(119):54856. doi: 10.3791/54856.
7
Concurrent emotional pictures modulate temporal order judgments of spatially separated audio-tactile stimuli.同时呈现的情绪图片会影响空间分离的视听刺激的时间顺序判断。
Brain Res. 2013 Nov 6;1537:156-63. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
8
Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases?自由观察中的感知不对称能否通过扫描、运动前或注意力偏差来解释?
Cortex. 2002 Apr;38(2):113-36. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70645-2.
9
Time perception and temporal order memory.时间感知与时间顺序记忆。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 May;148:173-80. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
10
Distinguishing subcortical and cortical influences in visual attention. Subcortical attentional processing.区分视觉注意力中皮层下和皮层的影响。皮层下注意力处理。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997 Feb;38(2):364-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Independent-channels models of temporal-order judgment revisited: A model comparison.重新审视时间顺序判断的独立通道模型:模型比较。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Aug;86(6):2187-2209. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02915-5. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
2
Stuck on a Plateau? A Model-Based Approach to Fundamental Issues in Visual Temporal-Order Judgments.停滞不前?一种基于模型的视觉时间顺序判断基本问题研究方法。
Vision (Basel). 2018 Jul 16;2(3):29. doi: 10.3390/vision2030029.

本文引用的文献

1
Stuck on a Plateau? A Model-Based Approach to Fundamental Issues in Visual Temporal-Order Judgments.停滞不前?一种基于模型的视觉时间顺序判断基本问题研究方法。
Vision (Basel). 2018 Jul 16;2(3):29. doi: 10.3390/vision2030029.
2
Differences between endogenous attention to spatial locations and sensory modalities.内源性注意在空间位置和感觉模态之间的差异。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Oct;235(10):2983-2996. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5030-4. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
3
Attentional weights in vision as products of spatial and nonspatial components.视觉中的注意力权重是空间和非空间成分的产物。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Jun;25(3):1043-1051. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1337-1.
4
Measuring and modeling salience with the theory of visual attention.运用视觉注意理论测量和建模显著性。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Aug;79(6):1593-1614. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1325-6.
5
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments.通过基于模型的时间顺序判断分析来测量注意力和视觉处理速度。
J Vis Exp. 2017 Jan 23(119):54856. doi: 10.3791/54856.
6
Audiovisual Temporal Processing and Synchrony Perception in the Rat.大鼠的视听时间处理与同步感知
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jan 10;10:246. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00246. eCollection 2016.
7
Theory of Visual Attention (TVA) applied to mice in the 5-choice serial reaction time task.视觉注意理论(TVA)应用于小鼠的五选择连续反应时任务。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Mar;234(5):845-855. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4520-6. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
8
Peripheral Visual Cues: Their Fate in Processing and Effects on Attention and Temporal-Order Perception.外周视觉线索:它们在加工过程中的命运以及对注意力和时间顺序感知的影响。
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 6;7:1442. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442. eCollection 2016.
9
No experimental evidence for visual prior entry of angry faces, even when feeling afraid.即使感到害怕,也没有愤怒面孔的视觉先验进入的实验证据。
Emotion. 2017 Feb;17(1):78-87. doi: 10.1037/emo0000205. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
10
Fast and Conspicuous? Quantifying Salience With the Theory of Visual Attention.快速且显著?运用视觉注意理论量化显著性
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2016 Mar 31;12(1):20-38. doi: 10.5709/acp-0184-1. eCollection 2016.