Department of Clinical Biochemistry (A.L., A.V., P.R.K., B.G.N.), and The Copenhagen General Population Study (A.L., A.V., P.R.K., B.G.N.), Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; The Copenhagen City Heart Study (B.G.N.), Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark; and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences (A.L., A.V., P.R.K., B.G.N.), University of Copenhagen, 1165 Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Jul;100(7):2690-9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-1096. Epub 2015 May 4.
It is unknown whether elevated lipoprotein(a) is causally associated with low-grade inflammation.
We tested the hypothesis that elevated lipoprotein(a) is observationally and causally associated with low-grade inflammation together with aortic valve stenosis and myocardial infarction.
Using a multidirectional Mendelian randomization approach, we studied 100,578 individuals from the Danish general population with plasma levels of and/or genotypes known to affect levels of lipoprotein(a) and C-reactive protein (CRP), and using information regarding diagnosis of aortic valve stenosis and of myocardial infarction (MI) from registries.
Observationally, CRP increased by 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23-34) per 50-mg/dL increase in lipoprotein(a). However, two LPA single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the kringle IV type 2 (KIV-2) genotype that were associated with 98, 95, and 68 mg/dL higher lipoprotein(a) levels were not causally associated with increased CRP levels. For aortic valve stenosis, a 1-SD increase in lipoprotein(a) levels was associated observationally with a multifactorially adjusted hazard ratio of 1.23 (95% CI, 1.06-1.41), with corresponding causal risk ratios of 1.38 (1.23-1.55) based on LPA SNPs and of 1.21 (1.06-1.40) based on LPA KIV-2 genotype. For myocardial infarction, corresponding values were 1.20 (1.10;1.31) observationally, and 1.18 (1.11;1.26) and 1.31 (1.22;1.42) causally, respectively. Observational hazard ratios for aortic valve stenosis and MI were similar after further adjustment for CRP levels.
Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) were not causally associated with increased low-grade inflammation as measured through CRP despite a causal association with increased risk of aortic valve stenosis and MI.
脂蛋白(a)升高是否与低度炎症有关尚不清楚。
我们检验了以下假说,即脂蛋白(a)升高与主动脉瓣狭窄和心肌梗死一起通过观察和因果关系与低度炎症有关。
我们使用多方向孟德尔随机化方法,研究了来自丹麦普通人群的 100578 名个体,这些个体具有已知影响脂蛋白(a)和 C 反应蛋白 (CRP)水平的血浆水平和/或基因型,并从登记处获得有关主动脉瓣狭窄和心肌梗死 (MI)诊断的信息。
观察发现,脂蛋白(a)每增加 50mg/dL,CRP 增加 29%(95%置信区间[CI],23-34)。然而,与脂蛋白(a)水平升高 98、95 和 68mg/dL 相关的两个 LPA 单核苷酸多态性 (SNP) 和 Kringle IV 型 2 (KIV-2) 基因型与 CRP 水平升高没有因果关系。对于主动脉瓣狭窄,脂蛋白(a)水平增加 1 个标准差与多因素调整后的风险比为 1.23(95%CI,1.06-1.41),相应的因果风险比为 1.38(1.23-1.55)基于 LPA SNP 和基于 LPA KIV-2 基因型为 1.21(1.06-1.40)。对于心肌梗死,观察到的相应值分别为 1.20(1.10;1.31),因果值分别为 1.18(1.11;1.26)和 1.31(1.22;1.42)。进一步调整 CRP 水平后,主动脉瓣狭窄和 MI 的观察到的风险比相似。
尽管脂蛋白(a)水平升高与主动脉瓣狭窄和 MI 的风险增加存在因果关系,但与 CRP 测量的低度炎症升高无关。