• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用健康信念模型审视参与社区心脏康复维持治疗的动机与障碍。

Examining motivations and barriers for attending maintenance community-based cardiac rehabilitation using the health-belief model.

作者信息

Horwood Hayley, Williams Michael J A, Mandic Sandra

机构信息

Active Living Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; Dunedin Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Heart Lung Circ. 2015 Oct;24(10):980-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2015.03.023. Epub 2015 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2015.03.023
PMID:25939724
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reasons for low attendance at maintenance cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs remain largely unknown. Using the Health Belief Model as a theoretical framework, this study compared the motivations and barriers for attending a community-based CR maintenance program in high attenders (HA), low attenders (LA) and non-attenders (NA) with coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

Forty-four older adults with CAD (70.5% males; age: 72.7±6.9 years; 11 HA, 16 LA and 17 NA) completed questionnaires examining reasons for attending CR: perceived threat (symptoms of CAD; the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire), perceived benefits (Multi-dimensional Outcomes Expectations for Exercise Scale), perceived barriers (Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale) and cues to action questionnaire.

RESULTS

Sociodemographic characteristics and perceived threat were not different between the groups. Compared to LA and NA, HA perceived greater social and physical (vs NA only) benefits of participation in maintenance CR and had fewer barriers to attending (all p<0.05). The CR program newsletter, personal health concerns and others having heart problems were stronger cues to action for HA versus NA (all p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Participants perceived greater benefits from attending CR, had fewer barriers and perceived stronger cues to action compared to non-attenders. Promoting CR maintenance programs should emphasise physical and social benefits and provide encouragement.

摘要

背景

心脏康复维持项目参与率低的原因在很大程度上仍不明确。本研究以健康信念模型为理论框架,比较了冠心病患者中高参与度者(HA)、低参与度者(LA)和未参与者(NA)参加社区心脏康复维持项目的动机和障碍。

方法

44名患有冠心病的老年人(男性占70.5%;年龄:72.7±6.9岁;11名高参与度者、16名低参与度者和17名未参与者)完成了关于参加心脏康复原因的问卷调查:感知威胁(冠心病症状;修订后的疾病认知问卷)、感知益处(运动量表的多维结果期望)、感知障碍(心脏康复障碍量表)和行动线索问卷。

结果

各组间社会人口学特征和感知威胁无差异。与低参与度者和未参与者相比,高参与度者感知到参与心脏康复维持项目有更大的社会和身体(仅与未参与者相比)益处,且参加的障碍更少(所有p<0.05)。与未参与者相比,心脏康复项目通讯、个人健康担忧以及其他人患有心脏病对高参与度者来说是更强的行动线索(所有p<0.05)。

结论

与未参与者相比,参与者认为参加心脏康复有更大益处,障碍更少,且行动线索更强。推广心脏康复维持项目应强调身体和社会效益并给予鼓励。

相似文献

1
Examining motivations and barriers for attending maintenance community-based cardiac rehabilitation using the health-belief model.运用健康信念模型审视参与社区心脏康复维持治疗的动机与障碍。
Heart Lung Circ. 2015 Oct;24(10):980-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2015.03.023. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
2
Adoption of community-based cardiac rehabilitation programs and physical activity following phase III cardiac rehabilitation in Scotland: a prospective and predictive study.苏格兰三期心脏康复后采用社区心脏康复项目和身体活动:前瞻性和预测性研究。
Psychol Health. 2010 Sep;25(7):839-54. doi: 10.1080/08870440902915915.
3
Outcomes associated with cardiac rehabilitation participation in patients with musculoskeletal comorbidities.患有肌肉骨骼合并症的患者参与心脏康复治疗的结果。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013 Dec;49(6):775-83. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
4
Long-term effects of cardiac rehabilitation in elderly individuals with stable coronary artery disease.心脏康复对老年稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者的长期影响。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(9):837-43. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1061611. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
5
Factors Associated With Attendance at a 1-yr Post-Cardiac Rehabilitation Risk Factor Check.与参加 1 年后心脏康复风险因素检查相关的因素。
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2020 May;40(3):E22-E25. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000486.
6
Important aspects in relation to patients' attendance at exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation - facilitators, barriers and physiotherapist's role: a qualitative study.与患者参与基于运动的心脏康复相关的重要方面——促进因素、障碍及物理治疗师的作用:一项定性研究
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Mar 14;17(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0512-7.
7
Barriers to participation in center-based cardiac rehabilitation programs and patients' attitude toward home-based cardiac rehabilitation programs.参与中心式心脏康复计划的障碍和患者对家庭式心脏康复计划的态度。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 Jan;37(1):158-168. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1620388. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
8
Community-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Maintenance Programs: Use and Effects.基于社区的心脏康复维持计划:应用与效果
Heart Lung Circ. 2015 Jul;24(7):710-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
9
Bridging the intention-behavior gap for cardiac rehabilitation participation: the role of perceived barriers.弥合参与心脏康复的意图-行为差距:感知障碍的作用。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 May;42(9):1284-1291. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1524519. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
10
Participating or not in a cardiac rehabilitation programme: factors influencing a patient's decision.参与或不参与心脏康复计划:影响患者决策的因素。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Apr;20(2):341-8. doi: 10.1177/2047487312437057. Epub 2012 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Adherence to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation and related factors in STEMI after PCI in China: a sequential explanatory mixed method study protocol.中国ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者PCI术后门诊心脏康复的依从性及相关因素:一项序贯解释性混合方法研究方案
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Aug 5;12:1542942. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1542942. eCollection 2025.
2
Development and Validation of the CHD-PEBBS: A Scale to Assess Perceived Exercise Benefits and Barriers in Coronary Heart Disease Patients.冠心病患者运动益处与障碍感知量表(CHD-PEBBS)的编制与验证
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Jul 22;19:2147-2159. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S524436. eCollection 2025.
3
'The illness isn't the end of the road'-Patient perspectives on the initiation of and early participation in a multi-disease, community-based exercise programme.
“疾病并不是终点”-患者对多疾病、社区为基础的运动计划的启动和早期参与的看法。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0291700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291700. eCollection 2024.
4
Engineering Virtuous health habits using Emotion and Neurocognition: Flexibility for Lifestyle Optimization and Weight management (EVEN FLOW).利用情感和神经认知塑造健康习惯:生活方式优化与体重管理的灵活性(EVEN FLOW)
Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Nov 22;15:1256430. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1256430. eCollection 2023.
5
An Intervention Program Using the Health Belief Model to Modify Lifestyle in Coronary Heart Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.一项基于健康信念模型的生活方式干预方案对冠心病患者的影响:随机对照试验
Int J Behav Med. 2024 Aug;31(4):631-641. doi: 10.1007/s12529-023-10201-1. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
6
Global perspectives on heart disease rehabilitation and secondary prevention: a scientific statement from the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions, European Association of Preventive Cardiology, and International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation.全球视角下的心脏病康复和二级预防:心血管护理和相关专业协会、欧洲预防心脏病学协会和国际心血管预防与康复理事会的科学声明。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Jul 21;44(28):2515-2525. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad225.
7
Social Isolation and Social Support Influence Health Service Utilisation and Survival after a Cardiovascular Disease Event: A Systematic Review.社会隔离和社会支持对心血管疾病事件后卫生服务利用和生存的影响:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 9;20(6):4853. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064853.
8
Remote maintenance cardiac rehabilitation (MAINTAIN): A protocol for a randomised feasibility study.远程维护心脏康复(MAINTAIN):一项随机可行性研究方案。
Digit Health. 2023 Feb 15;9:20552076231152176. doi: 10.1177/20552076231152176. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
9
Digital home-based multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation: How to counteract physical inactivity during the COVID-19 pandemic.基于数字家庭的多学科心脏康复:如何在新冠疫情期间应对身体活动不足的问题。
Rev Port Cardiol. 2022 Mar;41(3):209-218. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2021.05.013. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
10
Identification of Immunosuppressive Medication Nonadherence Factors Through a Combined Theory Model in Renal Transplant Recipients: 6-12.通过联合理论模型识别肾移植受者免疫抑制药物治疗不依从因素:6 - 12
Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 26;12:655836. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.655836. eCollection 2021.