Suppr超能文献

为英格兰养老院提供国民保健服务体系的全科和专科服务:调查综述

Provision of NHS generalist and specialist services to care homes in England: review of surveys.

作者信息

Iliffe Steve, Davies Susan L, Gordon Adam L, Schneider Justine, Dening Tom, Bowman Clive, Gage Heather, Martin Finbarr C, Gladman John R F, Victor Christina, Meyer Julienne, Goodman Claire

机构信息

1Department of Primary Care & Population Health,University College London,London,UK.

2Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care,University of Hertfordshire,Hertfordshire,UK.

出版信息

Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2016 Mar;17(2):122-37. doi: 10.1017/S1463423615000250. Epub 2015 May 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The number of beds in care homes (with and without nurses) in the United Kingdom is three times greater than the number of beds in National Health Service (NHS) hospitals. Care homes are predominantly owned by a range of commercial, not-for-profit or charitable providers and their residents have high levels of disability, frailty and co-morbidity. NHS support for care home residents is very variable, and it is unclear what models of clinical support work and are cost-effective.

OBJECTIVES

To critically evaluate how the NHS works with care homes.

METHODS

A review of surveys of NHS services provided to care homes that had been completed since 2008. It included published national surveys, local surveys commissioned by Primary Care organisations, studies from charities and academic centres, grey literature identified across the nine government regions, and information from care home, primary care and other research networks. Data extraction captured forms of NHS service provision for care homes in England in terms of frequency, location, focus and purpose.

RESULTS

Five surveys focused primarily on general practitioner services, and 10 on specialist services to care home. Working relationships between the NHS and care homes lack structure and purpose and have generally evolved locally. There are wide variations in provision of both generalist and specialist healthcare services to care homes. Larger care home chains may take a systematic approach to both organising access to NHS generalist and specialist services, and to supplementing gaps with in-house provision. Access to dental care for care home residents appears to be particularly deficient.

CONCLUSIONS

Historical differences in innovation and provision of NHS services, the complexities of collaborating across different sectors (private and public, health and social care, general and mental health), and variable levels of organisation of care homes, all lead to persistent and embedded inequity in the distribution of NHS resources to this population. Clinical commissioners seeking to improve the quality of care of care home residents need to consider how best to provide fair access to health care for older people living in a care home, and to establish a specification for service delivery to this vulnerable population.

摘要

背景

英国养老院(有护士和无护士)的床位数量是国民医疗服务体系(NHS)医院床位数量的三倍。养老院主要由一系列商业、非营利或慈善机构提供,其居民有高度的残疾、虚弱和合并症。NHS对养老院居民的支持差异很大,目前尚不清楚何种临床支持模式有效且具有成本效益。

目的

批判性地评估NHS与养老院的合作方式。

方法

对2008年以来完成的关于NHS提供给养老院的服务的调查进行综述。包括已发表的全国性调查、初级保健组织委托进行的地方性调查、慈善机构和学术中心的研究、九个政府区域确定的灰色文献,以及来自养老院、初级保健和其他研究网络的信息。数据提取从频率、地点、重点和目的方面获取了英格兰NHS为养老院提供服务的形式。

结果

五项调查主要关注全科医生服务,十项关注养老院的专科服务。NHS与养老院之间的工作关系缺乏结构和目的,总体上是在地方层面发展起来的。向养老院提供的全科和专科医疗服务存在很大差异。较大的养老院连锁机构可能会采取系统的方法来组织获取NHS的全科和专科服务,并通过内部提供来填补空白。养老院居民获得牙科护理的机会似乎特别不足。

结论

NHS服务创新和提供方面的历史差异、不同部门(私营和公共、健康和社会护理、普通和心理健康)合作的复杂性,以及养老院组织水平的差异,都导致了NHS资源分配给这一人群时持续存在且根深蒂固的不公平现象。寻求改善养老院居民护理质量的临床专员需要考虑如何最好地为住在养老院的老年人提供公平的医疗服务,并为向这一弱势群体提供服务制定规范。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验