Suppr超能文献

帕金森病中多巴胺激动剂神经精神效应的头对头比较:一项针对非痴呆患者的前瞻性横断面研究。

Head-to-Head Comparison of the Neuropsychiatric Effect of Dopamine Agonists in Parkinson's Disease: A Prospective, Cross-Sectional Study in Non-demented Patients.

作者信息

Pérez-Pérez Jesús, Pagonabarraga Javier, Martínez-Horta Saül, Fernández-Bobadilla Ramón, Sierra Salvador, Pascual-Sedano Berta, Gironell Alexandre, Kulisevsky Jaime

机构信息

Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Sant Pau Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sant Antoni M. Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Drugs Aging. 2015 May;32(5):401-7. doi: 10.1007/s40266-015-0264-y.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Dopaminergic agonists (DAs) are widely used to treat motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). The differential effect of DAs on neuropsychiatric symptoms of PD has not been accurately studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective cross-sectional study of 515 non-demented PD patients receiving treatment with pramipexole [n = 250, monotherapy or with levodopa (L-dopa)], ropinirole (n = 150, monotherapy or with L-dopa), or L-dopa (n = 115, monotherapy); all formulations were immediate release. Neuropsychiatric disturbances were assessed through the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Groups were matched in terms of age, education, sex, disease severity (Hoehn and Yahr), disease duration, executive function, total L-dopa daily equivalent dose, and concomitant psychotropic medications (antidepressants, anxiolytics and antipsychotic agents).

RESULTS

Patients on pramipexole showed significantly lower total NPI scores than patients on ropinirole (17.2 ± 11 vs. 20.9 ± 13, p = 0.015). Regarding the spectrum of neuropsychiatric symptoms, pramipexole was associated with significantly lower apathy scores than the L-dopa group (1.01 ± 1.7 vs. 1.87 ± 2.93, p = 0.02). The frequency of patients with clinically meaningful symptoms of apathy (NPI apathy scores ≥ 4) was significantly lower in the pramipexole group (11.2 %) than in the ropinirole (20.3 %) and L-dopa (23.8 %) groups (χ (2) 12.49, p = 0.002). No other significant differences were found in NPI subscores between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first head-to-head comparative study of the effect of DAs on neuropsychiatric disturbances in PD that has controlled the sample for the most important confounding factors. In comparable groups of patients, the use of pramipexole seems to be associated with a lower frequency and severity of apathetic symptoms.

摘要

引言

多巴胺能激动剂(DAs)被广泛用于治疗帕金森病(PD)的运动症状。DAs对PD神经精神症状的差异作用尚未得到准确研究。

材料与方法

我们对515例接受普拉克索治疗的非痴呆PD患者进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究,其中普拉克索组250例(单药治疗或与左旋多巴联合治疗),罗匹尼罗组150例(单药治疗或与左旋多巴联合治疗),左旋多巴组115例(单药治疗);所有制剂均为速释剂型。通过神经精神量表(NPI)评估神经精神障碍。根据年龄、教育程度、性别、疾病严重程度(Hoehn和Yahr分级)、病程、执行功能、左旋多巴每日等效总剂量以及同时使用的精神药物(抗抑郁药、抗焦虑药和抗精神病药)对各组进行匹配。

结果

普拉克索治疗的患者NPI总分显著低于罗匹尼罗治疗的患者(17.2±11 vs. 20.9±13,p = 0.015)。在神经精神症状谱方面,普拉克索治疗的患者情感淡漠评分显著低于左旋多巴组(1.01±1.7 vs. 1.87±2.93,p = 0.02)。普拉克索组中具有临床意义的情感淡漠症状(NPI情感淡漠评分≥4)患者的频率显著低于罗匹尼罗组(20.3%)和左旋多巴组(23.8%)(χ² = 12.49,p = 0.002)。各组之间在NPI子评分方面未发现其他显著差异。

结论

这是第一项针对DAs对PD神经精神障碍影响的头对头比较研究,该研究对最重要的混杂因素进行了样本控制。在可比的患者组中,使用普拉克索似乎与情感淡漠症状的较低频率和严重程度相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验