Rees Philippa, Edwards Adrian, Panesar Sukhmeet, Powell Colin, Carter Ben, Williams Huw, Hibbert Peter, Luff Donna, Parry Gareth, Mayor Sharon, Avery Anthony, Sheikh Aziz, Donaldson Sir Liam, Carson-Stevens Andrew
Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales;
Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland;
Pediatrics. 2015 Jun;135(6):1027-35. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3259. Epub 2015 May 4.
In the United Kingdom, 26% of child deaths have identifiable failures in care. Although children account for 40% of family physicians' workload, little is known about the safety of care in the community setting. Using data from a national patient safety incident reporting system, this study aimed to characterize the pediatric safety incidents occurring in family practice.
We undertook a retrospective, cross-sectional, mixed methods study of pediatric reports submitted to the UK National Reporting and Learning System from family practice. Analysis involved detailed data coding using multiaxial frameworks, descriptive statistical analysis, and thematic analysis of a special-case sample of reports. Using frequency distributions and cross-tabulations, the relationships between incident types and contributory factors were explored.
Of 1788 reports identified, 763 (42.7%) described harm to children. Three crosscutting priority areas were identified: medication management, assessment and referral, and treatment. The 4 incident types associated with the most harmful outcomes are errors associated with diagnosis and assessment, delivery of treatment and procedures, referrals, and medication provision. Poor referral and treatment decisions in severely unwell or vulnerable children, along with delayed diagnosis and insufficient assessment of such children, featured prominently in incidents resulting in severe harm or death.
This is the first analysis of nationally collected, family practice-related pediatric safety incident reports. Recommendations to mitigate harm in these priority areas include mandatory pediatric training for all family physicians; use of electronic tools to support diagnosis, management, and referral decision-making; and use of technological adjuncts such as barcode scanning to reduce medication errors.
在英国,26%的儿童死亡案例中存在可识别的护理失误。尽管儿童占家庭医生工作量的40%,但对于社区环境下护理的安全性却知之甚少。本研究利用国家患者安全事件报告系统的数据,旨在描述家庭医疗中发生的儿科安全事件的特征。
我们对提交至英国国家报告与学习系统的来自家庭医疗的儿科报告进行了一项回顾性、横断面、混合方法研究。分析包括使用多轴框架进行详细的数据编码、描述性统计分析以及对报告的特殊案例样本进行主题分析。通过频率分布和交叉表,探讨了事件类型与促成因素之间的关系。
在识别出的1788份报告中,763份(42.7%)描述了对儿童的伤害。确定了三个贯穿各领域的优先领域:药物管理、评估与转诊以及治疗。与最有害结果相关的4种事件类型是与诊断和评估、治疗及程序实施、转诊以及药物供应相关的错误。在病情严重或易受伤害的儿童中,转诊和治疗决策不当,以及对此类儿童的诊断延迟和评估不足,在导致严重伤害或死亡的事件中尤为突出。
这是对全国收集的、与家庭医疗相关的儿科安全事件报告的首次分析。在这些优先领域减轻伤害的建议包括对所有家庭医生进行强制性儿科培训;使用电子工具支持诊断、管理和转诊决策;以及使用条形码扫描等技术辅助手段减少用药错误。