Rajamani A, Barrett E, Weisbrodt L, Bourne J, Palejs P, Gresham R, Huang S
Intensive Care Unit, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales.
Intensive Care Nursing and Clinical Research Management, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 May;43(3):335-40. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1504300309.
International literature on end-of-life care in intensive care units (ICUs) supports the use of 'protocol bundles', which is not common practice in our 18-bed adult general ICU in Sydney, New South Wales. We conducted a prospective observational study to identify problems related to end-of-life care practices and to determine whether there was a need to develop protocol bundles. Any ICU patient who had 'withdrawal' of life-sustaining treatment to facilitate a comfortable death was eligible. Exclusion criteria included organ donors, unsuitable family dynamics and lack of availability of research staff to obtain family consent. Process-of-care measures were collected using a standardised form. Satisfaction ratings were obtained using de-identified questionnaire surveys given to the healthcare staff shortly after the withdrawal of therapy and to the families 30 days later. Twenty-three patients were enrolled between June 2011 and July 2012. Survey questionnaires were given to 25 family members and 30 healthcare staff, with a high completion rate (24 family members [96%] and 28 staff [93.3%]). Problems identified included poor documentation of family meetings (39%) and symptom management. Emotional/spiritual support was not offered to families (39.1%) or ICU staff (0%). The overall level of end-of-life care was good. The overwhelming majority of families and healthcare staff were highly satisfied with the care provided. Problems identified related to communication documentation and lack of spiritual/emotional support. To address these problems, targeted measures would be more useful than the adoption of protocol bundles. Alternate models of satisfaction surveys may be needed.
关于重症监护病房(ICU)临终关怀的国际文献支持使用“协议包”,但在我们位于新南威尔士州悉尼的拥有18张床位的成人综合ICU中,这并非常见做法。我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,以确定与临终关怀实践相关的问题,并确定是否有必要制定协议包。任何接受“撤除”维持生命治疗以促进安详死亡的ICU患者均符合条件。排除标准包括器官捐献者、不合适的家庭动态以及缺乏研究人员获取家属同意。使用标准化表格收集护理过程措施。满意度评分通过在治疗撤除后不久向医护人员发放的匿名问卷调查以及30天后向家属发放的问卷获得。2011年6月至2012年7月期间共纳入23名患者。向25名家属和30名医护人员发放了调查问卷,完成率很高(24名家属[96%]和28名工作人员[93.3%])。发现的问题包括家庭会议记录不佳(39%)和症状管理。未向家属(39.1%)或ICU工作人员(0%)提供情感/精神支持。临终关怀的总体水平良好。绝大多数家属和医护人员对所提供的护理高度满意。发现的问题与沟通记录以及缺乏精神/情感支持有关。为解决这些问题,针对性措施可能比采用协议包更有用。可能需要其他满意度调查模式。