Suppr超能文献

与全膝关节置换术中的常规止血方法相比,局部和静脉注射氨甲环酸可减少失血:一项多中心、随机、对照试验。

Topical and intravenous tranexamic acid reduce blood loss compared to routine hemostasis in total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.

作者信息

Aguilera X, Martínez-Zapata M J, Hinarejos P, Jordán M, Leal J, González J C, Monllau J C, Celaya F, Rodríguez-Arias A, Fernández J A, Pelfort X, Puig-Verdie L l

机构信息

Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Sant Antoni Mª Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Jul;135(7):1017-25. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2232-8. Epub 2015 May 7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is becoming widely used in orthopedic surgery to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements, but consensus is lacking regarding the optimal route and dose of administration. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of topical and intravenous routes of TXA with routine hemostasis in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a randomized, multicenter, parallel, open-label clinical trial in adult patients undergoing primary TKA. Patients were divided into three groups of 50 patients each: Group 1 received 1 g topical TXA, Group 2 received 2 g intravenous TXA, and Group 3 (control group) had routine hemostasis. The primary outcome was total blood loss. Secondary outcomes were hidden blood loss, blood collected in drains, transfusion rate, number of blood units transfused, adverse events, and mortality.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty patients were included. Total blood loss was 1021.57 (481.09) mL in Group 1, 817.54 (324.82) mL in Group 2 and 1415.72 (595.11) mL in Group 3 (control group). Differences in total blood loss between the TXA groups and the control group were clinically and statistically significant (p < 0.001). In an exploratory analysis differences between the two TXA groups were not statistically significant (p = 0.073) Seventeen patients were transfused. Transfusion requirements were significantly higher in Group 3 (p = 0.005). No significant differences were found between groups regarding adverse events.

CONCLUSION

We found that 1 g of topical TXA and 2 g of intravenous TXA were both safe strategies and more effective than routine hemostasis to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements after primary TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

摘要

引言

氨甲环酸(TXA)在骨科手术中被广泛用于减少失血和输血需求,但在最佳给药途径和剂量方面缺乏共识。本研究的目的是比较TXA局部和静脉给药途径与常规止血方法在初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者中的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

我们对接受初次TKA的成年患者进行了一项随机、多中心、平行、开放标签的临床试验。患者分为三组,每组50例:第1组接受1g局部TXA,第2组接受2g静脉TXA,第3组(对照组)采用常规止血方法。主要结局指标是总失血量。次要结局指标包括隐性失血量、引流管引流量、输血率、输血量、不良事件和死亡率。

结果

共纳入150例患者。第1组总失血量为1021.57(481.09)mL,第2组为817.54(324.82)mL,第3组(对照组)为1415.72(595.11)mL。TXA组与对照组之间的总失血量差异在临床和统计学上均具有显著性(p<0.001)。在探索性分析中,两个TXA组之间的差异无统计学意义(p=0.073)。17例患者接受了输血。第3组的输血需求显著更高(p=0.005)。各组之间在不良事件方面未发现显著差异。

结论

我们发现,1g局部TXA和2g静脉TXA都是安全的策略,并且在减少初次TKA后的失血和输血需求方面比常规止血方法更有效。

证据水平

I级

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验