Aguilera X, Martínez-Zapata M J, Hinarejos P, Jordán M, Leal J, González J C, Monllau J C, Celaya F, Rodríguez-Arias A, Fernández J A, Pelfort X, Puig-Verdie L l
Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Sant Antoni Mª Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Jul;135(7):1017-25. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2232-8. Epub 2015 May 7.
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is becoming widely used in orthopedic surgery to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements, but consensus is lacking regarding the optimal route and dose of administration. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of topical and intravenous routes of TXA with routine hemostasis in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
We performed a randomized, multicenter, parallel, open-label clinical trial in adult patients undergoing primary TKA. Patients were divided into three groups of 50 patients each: Group 1 received 1 g topical TXA, Group 2 received 2 g intravenous TXA, and Group 3 (control group) had routine hemostasis. The primary outcome was total blood loss. Secondary outcomes were hidden blood loss, blood collected in drains, transfusion rate, number of blood units transfused, adverse events, and mortality.
One hundred and fifty patients were included. Total blood loss was 1021.57 (481.09) mL in Group 1, 817.54 (324.82) mL in Group 2 and 1415.72 (595.11) mL in Group 3 (control group). Differences in total blood loss between the TXA groups and the control group were clinically and statistically significant (p < 0.001). In an exploratory analysis differences between the two TXA groups were not statistically significant (p = 0.073) Seventeen patients were transfused. Transfusion requirements were significantly higher in Group 3 (p = 0.005). No significant differences were found between groups regarding adverse events.
We found that 1 g of topical TXA and 2 g of intravenous TXA were both safe strategies and more effective than routine hemostasis to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements after primary TKA.
I.
氨甲环酸(TXA)在骨科手术中被广泛用于减少失血和输血需求,但在最佳给药途径和剂量方面缺乏共识。本研究的目的是比较TXA局部和静脉给药途径与常规止血方法在初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者中的疗效和安全性。
我们对接受初次TKA的成年患者进行了一项随机、多中心、平行、开放标签的临床试验。患者分为三组,每组50例:第1组接受1g局部TXA,第2组接受2g静脉TXA,第3组(对照组)采用常规止血方法。主要结局指标是总失血量。次要结局指标包括隐性失血量、引流管引流量、输血率、输血量、不良事件和死亡率。
共纳入150例患者。第1组总失血量为1021.57(481.09)mL,第2组为817.54(324.82)mL,第3组(对照组)为1415.72(595.11)mL。TXA组与对照组之间的总失血量差异在临床和统计学上均具有显著性(p<0.001)。在探索性分析中,两个TXA组之间的差异无统计学意义(p=0.073)。17例患者接受了输血。第3组的输血需求显著更高(p=0.005)。各组之间在不良事件方面未发现显著差异。
我们发现,1g局部TXA和2g静脉TXA都是安全的策略,并且在减少初次TKA后的失血和输血需求方面比常规止血方法更有效。
I级