Suppr超能文献

静脉内与局部使用氨甲环酸在脊柱手术中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Intravenous versus topical tranexamic acid in spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Orthopedics Department, The Seven Affiliated Hospital of South China University, Changsha, 410000, China.

Department of Spine Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of South China University, Hengyang, 421000, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Aug 27;19(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04989-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) during spinal surgery has been shown to reduce blood loss. However, the efficacy and safety of intravenous TXA (ivTXA) and topical TXA (tTXA) are poorly documented. The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ivTXA and tTXA administration in spinal surgery.

METHODS

Potentially relevant academic articles were identified from PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library, CNKI database, and Wanfang Data from the date of inception until March 1, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) were included in our meta-analysis if they compared the efficacy and safety of ivTXA versus tTXA administration during spinal surgery. Secondary sources were identified from the references of the included literature. The meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook and the PRISMA statement. Data were summarized using RevMan 5.3 software from Denmark.

RESULTS

Four RCTs and one non-RCT met our inclusion criteria. The pooled outcomes demonstrated that ivTXA groups compared with tTXA groups had significantly less amount of total blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD)=-159.55, 95% CI (-181.91,-137.19), P < 0.00001], hidden blood loss [WMD=-132.27, 95% CI (-159.81, -104.72), P < 0.00001], intraoperative blood loss [WMD=-86.22, 95% CI (-99.13, -73.31), P < 0.00001, I = 96%], and more high postoperative hemoglobin level [WMD = 8.96, 95% CI (5.18, 12.75), P < 0.00001, I = 29%], and less transfusion rate [risk ratio (RR) = 1.11, 95% CI (0.81,1.52), P = 0.50, I = 94%]. The pooled results showed no significant difference in thromboembolic events (deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that ivTXA was more effective than tTXA in inducing hemostatic effect during spinal surgery. However, the risk of a thrombotic event was not different between the two administration methods of TXA. More high quality RCTs are needed to further confirm our conclusions.

摘要

背景

在脊柱手术中使用氨甲环酸(TXA)已被证明可以减少失血。然而,静脉注射 TXA(ivTXA)和局部 TXA(tTXA)的疗效和安全性记录不佳。本荟萃分析旨在比较脊柱手术中使用 ivTXA 和 tTXA 的疗效和安全性。

方法

从 PubMed、Ovid、Cochrane 图书馆、中国知网数据库和万方数据中检索到从成立日期到 2024 年 3 月 1 日可能相关的学术文章。如果随机对照试验(RCT)和非随机对照试验(非 RCT)比较了脊柱手术中 ivTXA 与 tTXA 给药的疗效和安全性,则将其纳入我们的荟萃分析。从纳入文献的参考文献中确定了次要来源。荟萃分析按照 Cochrane 评论员手册和 PRISMA 声明的指南进行。使用来自丹麦的 RevMan 5.3 软件汇总数据。

结果

四项 RCT 和一项非 RCT 符合我们的纳入标准。汇总结果表明,与 tTXA 组相比,ivTXA 组的总失血量明显减少[加权均数差(WMD)=-159.55,95%CI(-181.91,-137.19),P<0.00001],隐性失血[WMD=-132.27,95%CI(-159.81,-104.72),P<0.00001],术中失血[WMD=-86.22,95%CI(-99.13,-73.31),P<0.00001,I=96%],以及更高的术后血红蛋白水平[WMD=8.96,95%CI(5.18,12.75),P<0.00001,I=29%],以及更低的输血率[风险比(RR)=1.11,95%CI(0.81,1.52),P=0.50,I=94%]。两组间血栓栓塞事件(深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞)无显著差异。

结论

本荟萃分析表明,ivTXA 在诱导脊柱手术止血效果方面优于 tTXA。然而,两种 TXA 给药方式的血栓形成事件风险并无差异。需要更多高质量的 RCT 来进一步证实我们的结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68af/11348596/535c0246fa61/13018_2024_4989_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验