Suppr超能文献

患者对其睡眠时间的估计:可靠性及其对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停诊断的影响。

Patients' estimates of their sleep times: reliability and impact on diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea.

作者信息

Khor Y H, Tolson J, Churchward T, Rochford P, Worsnop C

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2015 Aug;45(8):850-3. doi: 10.1111/imj.12798.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Home polysomnography (PSG) is an alternative method for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Some types 3 and 4 PSG do not monitor sleep and so rely on patients' estimation of total sleep time (TST).

AIM

To compare patients' subjective sleep duration estimation with objective measures in patients who underwent type 2 PSG for probable OSA.

METHODS

A prospective clinical audit of 536 consecutive patients of one of the authors between 2006 and 2013. A standard questionnaire was completed by the patients the morning after the home PSG to record the time of lights being turned off and estimated time of sleep onset and offset. PSG was scored based on the guidelines of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

RESULTS

Median estimated sleep latency (SL) was 20 min compared with 10 min for measured SL (P < 0.0001). There was also a significant difference between the estimated and measured sleep offset time (median difference = -1 min, P = 0.01). Estimated TST was significantly shorter than the measured TST (median difference = -18.5 min, P = 0.002). No factors have been identified to affect patients' accuracy of sleep perception. Only 2% of patients had a change in their diagnosis of OSA based on calculated apnoea-hypopnoea index.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall estimated TST in the patients with probable OSA was significantly shorter than measured with significant individual variability. Collectively, inaccurate sleep time estimation had not resulted in significant difference in the diagnosis of OSA.

摘要

背景

家庭多导睡眠图(PSG)是诊断阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的一种替代方法。某些3型和4型PSG不监测睡眠,因此依赖患者对总睡眠时间(TST)的估计。

目的

比较疑似OSA患者接受2型PSG检查时,患者主观睡眠时长估计与客观测量结果。

方法

对2006年至2013年间一位作者连续收治的536例患者进行前瞻性临床审计。患者在家庭PSG检查后的早晨填写一份标准问卷,记录关灯时间以及估计的入睡和起床时间。PSG根据美国睡眠医学学会的指南进行评分。

结果

估计的睡眠潜伏期(SL)中位数为20分钟,而测量的SL为10分钟(P < 0.0001)。估计的和测量的起床时间之间也存在显著差异(中位数差异 = -1分钟,P = 0.01)。估计的TST明显短于测量的TST(中位数差异 = -18.5分钟,P = 0.002)。尚未发现影响患者睡眠感知准确性的因素。基于计算的呼吸暂停低通气指数,只有2%的患者OSA诊断发生了变化。

结论

疑似OSA患者总体估计的TST明显短于测量值,且个体差异显著。总体而言,睡眠时间估计不准确并未导致OSA诊断出现显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验