Sørensen Nina N, Lassen Anne D, Løje Hanne, Tetens Inge
1Division of Nutrition,National Food Institute,Technical University of Denmark,Mørkhøj Bygade 19,DK-2860 Søborg,Denmark.
2Division of Industrial Food Research,National Food Institute,Technical University of Denmark,Kongens Lyngby,Denmark.
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Sep;18(13):2350-7. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015001421. Epub 2015 May 6.
With political support from the Danish Organic Action Plan 2020, organic public procurement in Denmark is expected to increase. In order to evaluate changes in organic food procurement in Danish public kitchens, reliable methods are needed. The present study aimed to compare organic food procurement measurements by two methods and to collect and discuss baseline organic food procurement measurements from public kitchens participating in the Danish Organic Action Plan 2020.
Comparison study measuring organic food procurement by applying two different methods, one based on the use of procurement invoices (the Organic Cuisine Label method) and the other on self-reported procurement (the Dogme method). Baseline organic food procurement status was based on organic food procurement measurements and background information from public kitchens.
Public kitchens participating in the six organic food conversion projects funded by the Danish Organic Action Plan 2020 during 2012 and 2013.
Twenty-six public kitchens (comparison study) and 345 public kitchens (baseline organic food procurement status).
A high significant correlation coefficient was found between the two organic food procurement measurement methods (r=0·83, P<0·001) with measurements relevant for the baseline status. Mean baseline organic food procurement was found to be 24 % when including measurements from both methods.
The results indicate that organic food procurement measurements by both methods were valid for the baseline status report of the Danish Organic Action Plan 2020. Baseline results in Danish public kitchens suggest there is room for more organic as well as sustainable public procurement in Denmark.
在《2020年丹麦有机行动计划》的政策支持下,丹麦的有机公共采购有望增加。为评估丹麦公共厨房有机食品采购的变化,需要可靠的方法。本研究旨在比较两种方法对有机食品采购的测量,并收集和讨论参与《2020年丹麦有机行动计划》的公共厨房的有机食品采购基线测量数据。
采用两种不同方法测量有机食品采购的比较研究,一种基于采购发票的使用(有机烹饪标签法),另一种基于自我报告的采购(教条法)。有机食品采购基线状态基于公共厨房的有机食品采购测量数据和背景信息。
2012年和2013年参与由《2020年丹麦有机行动计划》资助的六个有机食品转换项目的公共厨房。
26个公共厨房(比较研究)和345个公共厨房(有机食品采购基线状态)。
两种有机食品采购测量方法之间发现高度显著的相关系数(r = 0·83,P < 0·001),且与基线状态相关的测量数据相符。当包括两种方法的测量数据时,平均基线有机食品采购量为24%。
结果表明,两种方法对有机食品采购的测量对于《2020年丹麦有机行动计划》的基线状态报告均有效。丹麦公共厨房的基线结果表明,丹麦在更多有机及可持续公共采购方面仍有空间。