Anneken David, Striebich Richard, DeWitt Matthew J, Klingshirn Christopher, Corporan Edwin
a University of Dayton Research Institute , Dayton , OH , USA.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2015 Mar;65(3):336-46. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2014.991855.
Aircraft turbine engines are a significant source of particulate matter (PM) and gaseous emissions in the vicinity of airports and military installations. Hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) (e.g., formaldehyde, benzene, naphthalene and other compounds) associated with aircraft emissions are an environmental concern both in flight and at ground level. Therefore, effective sampling, identification, and accurate measurement of these trace species are important to assess their environmental impact. This effort evaluates two established ambient air sampling and analysis methods, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method TO-11A and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Method 1501, for potential use to quantify HAPs from aircraft turbine engines. The techniques were used to perform analysis of the exhaust from a T63 turboshaft engine, and were examined using certified gas standards transferred through the heated sampling systems used for engine exhaust gaseous emissions measurements. Test results show that the EPA Method TO-11A (for aldehydes) and NIOSH Method 1501 (for semivolatile hydrocarbons) were effective techniques for the sampling and analysis of most HAPs of interest. Both methods showed reasonable extraction efficiencies of HAP species from the sorbent tubes, with the exception of acrolein, styrene, and phenol, which were not well quantified. Formaldehyde measurements using dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) tubes (EPA method TO-11A) were accurate for gas-phase standards, and compared favorably to measurements using gas-phase Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. In general, these two standard methodologies proved to be suitable techniques for field measurement of turbine engine HAPs within a reasonable (5-10 minutes) sampling period. Details of the tests, the analysis methods, calibration procedures, and results from the gas standards and T63 engine tested using a conventional JP-8 jet fuel are provided.
HAPs from aviation-related sources are important because of their adverse health and environmental impacts in and around airports and flight lines. Simpler, more convenient techniques to measure the important HAPs, especially aldehydes and volatile organic HAPs, are needed to provide information about their occurrence and assist in the development of engines that emit fewer harmful emissions.
飞机涡轮发动机是机场和军事设施附近颗粒物(PM)和气态排放的重要来源。与飞机排放相关的有害空气污染物(HAPs)(如甲醛、苯、萘和其他化合物)在飞行中和地面上都是环境问题。因此,对这些痕量物质进行有效的采样、识别和准确测量对于评估其环境影响至关重要。这项工作评估了两种既定的环境空气采样和分析方法,即美国环境保护局(EPA)方法TO-11A和美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)方法1501,以确定其是否可用于量化飞机涡轮发动机排放的HAPs。这些技术被用于对一台T63涡轮轴发动机的排气进行分析,并通过用于发动机排气气态排放测量的加热采样系统传输的经认证气体标准进行检验。测试结果表明,EPA方法TO-11A(用于醛类)和NIOSH方法1501(用于半挥发性碳氢化合物)是对大多数感兴趣的HAPs进行采样和分析的有效技术。两种方法对吸附剂管中HAP物质的萃取效率都较为合理,但丙烯醛、苯乙烯和苯酚除外,它们的量化效果不佳。使用2,4-二硝基苯肼(DNPH)管(EPA方法TO-11A)对甲醛的测量对于气相标准来说是准确的,并且与使用气相傅里叶变换红外(FTIR)光谱法的测量结果相比具有优势。总体而言,这两种标准方法被证明是在合理的(5-10分钟)采样期内对涡轮发动机HAPs进行现场测量的合适技术。文中提供了测试细节、分析方法、校准程序以及使用传统JP-8喷气燃料测试的气体标准和T63发动机的结果。
来自航空相关源的HAPs很重要,因为它们会对机场及其周边和航线沿线的健康和环境产生不利影响。需要更简单、更便捷的技术来测量重要的HAPs,尤其是醛类和挥发性有机HAPs,以提供有关它们存在情况的信息,并协助开发排放更少有害污染物的发动机。