Suppr超能文献

在社会照料环境中对受照料儿童进行随机试验所面临的挑战。

Challenges to undertaking randomised trials with looked after children in social care settings.

作者信息

Mezey Gillian, Robinson Fiona, Campbell Rona, Gillard Steve, Macdonald Geraldine, Meyer Deborah, Bonell Chris, White Sarah

机构信息

Population Health Research Institute (PHRI), St Georges University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, England.

School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol University, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, England.

出版信息

Trials. 2015 May 7;16:206. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0708-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are widely viewed as the gold standard for assessing effectiveness in health research; however many researchers and practitioners believe that RCTs are inappropriate and un-doable in social care settings, particularly in relation to looked after children. The aim of this article is to describe the challenges faced in conducting a pilot study and phase II RCT of a peer mentoring intervention to reduce teenage pregnancy in looked after children in a social care setting.

METHODS

Interviews were undertaken with social care professionals and looked after children, and a survey conducted with looked after children, to establish the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and research design.

RESULTS

Barriers to recruitment and in managing the intervention were identified, including social workers acting as informal gatekeepers; social workers concerns and misconceptions about the recruitment criteria and the need for and purpose of randomisation; resource limitations, which made it difficult to prioritise research over other demands on their time and difficulties in engaging and retaining looked after children in the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The relative absence of a research infrastructure and culture in social care and the lack of research support funding available for social care agencies, compared to health organisations, has implications for increasing evidence-based practice in social care settings, particularly in this very vulnerable group of young people.

摘要

背景

随机对照试验(RCTs)被广泛视为健康研究中评估有效性的金标准;然而,许多研究人员和从业者认为,随机对照试验在社会护理环境中不合适且不可行,特别是对于受照料儿童而言。本文旨在描述在社会护理环境中开展一项同伴辅导干预措施的试点研究和二期随机对照试验,以减少受照料儿童青少年怀孕情况时所面临的挑战。

方法

与社会护理专业人员和受照料儿童进行了访谈,并对受照料儿童进行了一项调查,以确定该干预措施和研究设计的可行性及可接受性。

结果

确定了招募方面以及干预措施管理方面的障碍,包括社会工作者充当非正式把关人;社会工作者对招募标准以及随机化的必要性和目的存在担忧和误解;资源限制使得难以在研究与对他们时间的其他需求之间进行优先排序,以及在研究中吸引和留住受照料儿童存在困难。

结论

与卫生组织相比,社会护理领域相对缺乏研究基础设施和文化,且社会护理机构缺乏研究支持资金,这对在社会护理环境中增加循证实践有影响,尤其是对于这一非常脆弱的年轻人群体。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验