Suppr超能文献

无影像导航全髋关节置换术中联合前倾角的准确性:柄优先还是臼杯优先技术?

Accuracy of combined anteversion in image-free navigated total hip arthroplasty: stem-first or cup-first technique?

作者信息

Fukunishi Shigeo, Nishio Shoji, Fujihara Yuki, Okahisa Shohei, Takeda Yu, Fukui Tomokazu, Yoshiya Shinichi

机构信息

Orthopaedic Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2016 Jan;40(1):9-13. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2784-9. Epub 2015 May 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), combined anteversion (CA) is used as a parameter for assessment of overall prosthetic alignment. The purpose of this study was to comparatively examine the CA value in patients who underwent primary THA using the image-free navigation system either with a cup-first or stem-first technique.

METHODS

Eighty-three hips undergoing primary THA using the OrthoPilot® image-free navigation system (B. Braun-Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) were included in this study. The patient population was divided into two groups depending on the procedure used: cup-first technique and stem-first technique. In the cup-first group, inclination and anteversion (AV) angles were targeted at 35-45° and 15-25°, respectively, while stem antetorsion (AT) was determined for each patient based on the amount of individual native femoral AT angle. In the stem-first group, the femur was prepared first with the target angle corresponding to the native femoral AT and the cup AV was decided considering the CA calculated with Widmer's formula (aiming at the optimal Widmer's CA of 37.3°).

RESULTS

Better consistency in Widmer's CA values was attained in the stem-first group as indicated by the smaller SD values. In the assessment of overall alignment, Widmer's CA values were within the satisfactory range (37 ± 5°) in 41.9 and 92.3 % of the subjects in the cup-first group and the stem-first group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The stem-first technique with image-free navigated THA could effectively achieve accurate and consistent control of the CA value and thus is expected to improve the surgical outcome.

摘要

目的

在全髋关节置换术(THA)中,联合前倾角(CA)被用作评估整体假体对线的一个参数。本研究的目的是比较采用无影像导航系统、采用臼杯优先或柄优先技术进行初次THA的患者的CA值。

方法

本研究纳入了83例使用OrthoPilot®无影像导航系统(德国图特林根市贝朗蛇牌)进行初次THA的髋关节。根据所采用的手术方法,将患者人群分为两组:臼杯优先技术组和柄优先技术组。在臼杯优先组中,倾斜角和前倾角(AV)分别设定为35 - 45°和15 - 25°,而柄前倾角(AT)则根据每个患者的个体股骨固有AT角的大小来确定。在柄优先组中,首先按照与股骨固有AT对应的目标角度准备股骨,然后根据用维德默公式计算的CA来确定臼杯AV(目标是达到最佳的维德默CA值37.3°)。

结果

柄优先组的维德默CA值标准差较小,表明一致性更好。在整体对线评估中,臼杯优先组和柄优先组分别有41.9%和92.3%的受试者的维德默CA值在满意范围内(37 ± 5°)。

结论

采用无影像导航的柄优先技术进行THA能够有效地实现对CA值的精确和一致控制,因此有望改善手术效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验