Okada Taishi, Fukunishi Shigeo, Takeda Yu, Fukui Tomokazu, Fujihara Yuki, Nishio Shoji, Okahisa Shohei, Masumoto Yoshinobu, Yoshiya Shinichi
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1, Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 May;29(4):807-812. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02383-w. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
In the combined anteversion (CA) technique for total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a cementless stem, cup anteversion is strongly influenced by the native femoral anteversion. It is hypothesized that in cases with large native femoral anteversion, cup anteversion can be decreased, and anterior cup protrusion from the anterior edge of the acetabulum could occur due to the achievement of optimal CA. In this study, the accuracy of CA in THA with the CA technique using imageless navigation and the relationship between the protrusion of the anterior edge of cup and optimum CA was retrospectively evaluated.
Ninety-seven patients (104 hips) who underwent primary THA by the CA technique using image-free navigation were enrolled in the study. The femoral stem was placed following the individual femoral anteversion so that the target cup anteversion could be determined following a mathematical formula (37 = femoral stem anteversion × 0.7 + cup anteversion). Results The resulting CA values effectively achieved accurate CA with 39.49 ± 5.03° postoperatively. On the other hand, anterior cup protrusion was measured by computed tomography image. A cup protrusion length of more than 3 mm was indicated for 60 cases (57.7%). All included patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 as protrusion positive and Group 2 as protrusion negative. In Group 1, preoperative femoral anteversion and postoperative stem anteversion were significantly higher, while postoperative cup anteversion was significantly lower. However, the postoperative CA value indicated no significant difference between the groups.
The CA (stem-first) technique with image-free navigated THA could effectively achieve accurate CA. On the other hand, a large number of cases revealed anterior cup protrusion due to the low cup anteversion.
在使用非骨水泥型股骨柄的全髋关节置换术(THA)的联合前倾角(CA)技术中,髋臼杯前倾角受股骨自身前倾角的影响很大。据推测,在股骨自身前倾角较大的情况下,髋臼杯前倾角可以减小,并且由于实现了最佳的联合前倾角,髋臼杯可能会从髋臼前缘向前突出。在本研究中,回顾性评估了使用无图像导航的CA技术进行THA时联合前倾角的准确性以及髋臼杯前缘突出与最佳联合前倾角之间的关系。
本研究纳入了97例(104髋)使用无图像导航的CA技术进行初次THA的患者。根据个体股骨前倾角放置股骨柄,以便根据数学公式(37 = 股骨柄前倾角×0.7 + 髋臼杯前倾角)确定目标髋臼杯前倾角。结果术后联合前倾角值有效地实现了准确的联合前倾角,为39.49±5.03°。另一方面,通过计算机断层扫描图像测量髋臼杯前缘突出情况。60例(57.7%)显示髋臼杯突出长度超过3 mm。所有纳入患者分为两组:第1组为突出阳性组,第2组为突出阴性组。在第1组中,术前股骨前倾角和术后股骨柄前倾角显著更高,而术后髋臼杯前倾角显著更低。然而,术后联合前倾角值在两组之间无显著差异。
使用无图像导航的THA的联合前倾角(股骨柄优先)技术可以有效地实现准确的联合前倾角。另一方面,大量病例显示由于髋臼杯前倾角较低导致髋臼杯前缘突出。