• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在临床研究中,从伊朗癌症患者的知情同意书中获取感知信息。

The perceived information in obtained from the informed consent in Iranian patients with cancer in clinical studies.

作者信息

Ghiyasvandian Sharzad, Bolourchifard Fariba, Parsa Yekta Zohreh

机构信息

1. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Oct 29;7(3):1-7. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n3p1.

DOI:10.5539/gjhs.v7n3p1
PMID:25948425
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4802069/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

One of the basic issues in clinical studies is to receive the informed consent; that is to say, all the activities applied in patient's involvement in the information, decision-making, ability and volunteering in diagnosis, cure and care. In as much as most cancer patients require information about their individual needs, the present study is conducted to determine the perceived information from the informed consent of clinical studies in cancer patients.

METHODS

This is a descriptive study. Fifty cancer patients hospitalized for participating in the clinical study was chosen according to the convenience sampling. Tools used in this research included the questionnaire (individual and social features) and the check list about patient's right and cancer patient's information before and after receiving informed consent in clinical studies (10 items on a Likert rating scale). To validate the study, content and formal validation was used. Data in this research were analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequency, mean and standard deviation) and the software of SPSS 16.

RESULT

In general, the mean of the scores obtained from cancer patients' perceived information before completing the informed consent of the clinical studies was 14 ± 3.5 and after consent of the clinical studies was 16 ± 2.4. The cancer patients' perceived information before and after consent of the clinical studies was weak.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings of the present study, the rate of the information the cancer patients received, before completing the informed consent form, was low, but after completing the informed consent form this rate was again low. Therefore, conducting similar and wider studies is recommended to unveil the factors affecting perceiving information and how to promote the quality of the informed consent in other hospitals in Iran.

摘要

目的

临床研究中的基本问题之一是获得知情同意;也就是说,患者参与诊断、治疗和护理过程中的信息、决策、能力及自愿参与等所有活动。鉴于大多数癌症患者需要了解与其个人需求相关的信息,本研究旨在确定癌症患者从临床研究知情同意书中获取的信息认知情况。

方法

这是一项描述性研究。采用便利抽样法选取了50名因参与临床研究而住院的癌症患者。本研究使用的工具包括问卷(个人和社会特征)以及临床研究中患者在签署知情同意书前后的权利和癌症患者信息清单(李克特量表上的10个项目)。为验证该研究,采用了内容效度和形式效度。本研究中的数据使用描述性统计(频率、均值和标准差)及SPSS 16软件进行分析。

结果

总体而言,癌症患者在签署临床研究知情同意书之前获得的信息认知得分均值为14±3.5,签署之后为16±2.4。癌症患者在签署临床研究知情同意书前后的信息认知情况较差。

结论

基于本研究结果,癌症患者在签署知情同意书之前所获得的信息比例较低,签署之后这一比例仍然较低。因此,建议开展类似的更广泛研究,以揭示影响信息认知的因素以及如何提高伊朗其他医院知情同意书的质量。

相似文献

1
The perceived information in obtained from the informed consent in Iranian patients with cancer in clinical studies.在临床研究中,从伊朗癌症患者的知情同意书中获取感知信息。
Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Oct 29;7(3):1-7. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n3p1.
2
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
3
Perception on Informed Consent Regarding Nursing Care Practices in a Tertiary Care Center.关于三级护理中心护理实践的知情同意的认知
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2016;14(56):328-331.
4
An effective multisource informed consent procedure for research and clinical practice: an observational study of patient understanding and awareness of their roles as research stakeholders in a cancer biobank.一种有效的多源知情同意程序,适用于研究和临床实践:一项观察性研究,调查患者对其作为癌症生物库研究利益相关者的角色的理解和认知。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Jul 30;14:30. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-30.
5
Patients' perceived purpose of clinical informed consent: Mill's individual autonomy model is preferred.患者对临床知情同意的认知目的:密尔的个人自主模型更受青睐。
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Jan 10;15:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-2.
6
Assessing Parent Decisions About Child Participation in a Behavioral Health Intervention Study and Utility of Informed Consent Forms.评估父母关于孩子参与行为健康干预研究的决策和知情同意书的效用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e209296. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9296.
7
Levels of knowledge and perceived understanding among participants in cancer clinical trials - factors related to the informed consent procedure.癌症临床试验参与者的知识水平和认知理解——与知情同意程序相关的因素。
Clin Trials. 2011 Feb;8(1):77-84. doi: 10.1177/1740774510384516. Epub 2010 Nov 25.
8
Information disclosure in clinical informed consent: "reasonable" patient's perception of norm in high-context communication culture.临床知情同意中的信息披露:高语境沟通文化中“理性”患者对规范的认知
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Jan 10;15:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-3.
9
Intensive care patients' evaluations of the informed consent process.重症监护患者对知情同意过程的评估。
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):207-26. doi: 10.1097/01.DCC.0000286826.57603.6a.
10
Surgical informed consent in Iran--how much is it informed?伊朗的手术知情同意——其知情程度如何?
Nurs Ethics. 2014 May;21(3):314-22. doi: 10.1177/0969733013498525. Epub 2013 Oct 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical research before informed consent.知情同意前的临床研究。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2014 Jun;24(2):141-57. doi: 10.1353/ken.2014.0009.
2
Making a decision about trial participation: the feasibility of measuring deliberation during the informed consent process for clinical trials.做出关于参与试验的决定:在临床试验知情同意过程中衡量审慎思考的可行性。
Trials. 2014 Jul 30;15:307. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-307.
3
Informed consent and ECT: how much information should be provided?知情同意与电休克治疗:应提供多少信息?
J Med Ethics. 2015 May;41(5):371-4. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101885. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
4
The informed consent process in randomised controlled trials: a nurse-led process.随机对照试验中的知情同意程序:一项由护士主导的程序。
Nurs Prax N Z. 2014 Mar;30(1):17-28.
5
Patients' recollection and understanding of informed consent: a literature review.患者对知情同意的回忆与理解:一项文献综述
ANZ J Surg. 2014 Apr;84(4):207-10. doi: 10.1111/ans.12555.
6
Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials.用于参与临床试验的知情同意的信息视听展示。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 9;2014(5):CD003717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003717.pub3.
7
Person-centric clinical trials: Ethical challenges in recruitment and data transparency for improved outcomes.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Sep;54(9):1072-7. doi: 10.1002/jcph.308. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
8
[Informed consent: going through the motions?].[知情同意:只是走过场?]
Harefuah. 2014 Feb;153(2):115-8, 125.
9
Informed consent comprehension in African research settings.非洲研究环境中的知情同意理解情况。
Trop Med Int Health. 2014 Jun;19(6):625-642. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12288. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
10
Perception of Iranian nurses regarding ethics-based palliative care in cancer patients.伊朗护士对癌症患者基于伦理的姑息治疗的看法。
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2013 Dec 18;6:12. eCollection 2013.