Ormel J, Koeter M W, van den Brink W, Giel R
Department of Social Psychiatry, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Psychol Med. 1989 Nov;19(4):1007-13. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700005730.
Substantial cross-sectional correlations have been reported between the GHQ and PSE (and CIS) total scores. Although necessary, this is not a sufficient condition for assuming good validity of the GHQ as a severity measure in longitudinal and health care evaluation studies. For this purpose the GHQ should also accurately reflect changes in severity over time. To examine their concurrent validity, GHQ and PSE scores were compared, in a three-wave longitudinal study, among 175 new psychiatric out-patients. Using a longitudinal structural equation model that takes measurement error into account, the strength of both the cross-sectional and longitudinal relationship between GHQ and PSE were estimated. The GHQ performed remarkably well; changes in severity as defined by PSE-ID and PSE total score were clearly reflected by changes in GHQ scores. The revised scoring method of the GHQ proposed by Goodchild and Duncan-Jones did not yield superior results.
已有报告称,一般健康问卷(GHQ)与精神病症状评定量表(PSE)(以及临床访谈量表(CIS))的总分之间存在显著的横断面相关性。尽管这是必要条件,但在纵向研究和医疗保健评估研究中,这并非假设GHQ作为严重程度衡量指标具有良好效度的充分条件。为此,GHQ还应准确反映严重程度随时间的变化。为检验其同时效度,在一项三波纵向研究中,对175名新的精神科门诊患者的GHQ和PSE得分进行了比较。使用一个考虑了测量误差的纵向结构方程模型,估计了GHQ与PSE之间横断面和纵向关系的强度。GHQ表现得非常出色;PSE-ID和PSE总分所定义的严重程度变化通过GHQ得分的变化得到了清晰反映。古德柴尔德和邓肯-琼斯提出的GHQ修订计分方法并未产生更优结果。