Cape J
Camden & Islington Mental Health NHS Trust, St Pancras Hospital, 4 St Pancras Way, London NW1 0PE.
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Sep;51(470):724-9.
The emotional problems of patients presenting only somatic symptoms are frequently not detected by general practitioners (GPs), yet clinical outcomes have often been found to be no different from emotional problems directly presented.
To compare clinical outcomes and attributions for improvement of patients with emotional problems presenting only somatic symptoms to GPs, with patients directly presenting emotional problems.
Survey of patients with General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) scores in the symptomatic range, with follow-up after three months of a repeat GHQ and a questionnaire of patients' attributions for improvement.
A sample of 152 adult patients from nine general practices in North and East London.
Consecutive patients were invited to complete an adapted GHQ prior to their consultation. The consultations were audiotaped and coded to indicate the extent to which psychological discussion took place, as against discussion of other issues. The GPs recorded whether they considered each patient to be emotionally disturbed or psychiatrically ill at the time of the consultation, to assess GP detection of emotional disturbance. To form the initial sample, interviews were conducted one to five days after the consultation with patients who intended to present with either psychological or somatic problems, with a follow-up questionnaire after three months.
A total of 106 patients provided follow-up information, of whom 57 presented psychological problems directly at initial consultation and 49 presented only somatic symptoms. There were no differences in clinical outcome at three months between the two groups. Somatic presenters who improved were more likely than psychological presenters to attribute improvement to change in their physical health (68% versus 31%) while psychological presenters were more likely to attribute improvement to the GP's listening and counselling in the consultation (44% versus 18%). Other attributions for improvement, such as passage of time, change in life circumstances, support of family and friends, medication, and 'working through problems myself', were equally common in both groups.
Patients with emotional problems presenting only somatic symptoms have equivalent clinical outcomes to patients presenting psychological problems directly, but are more likely to attribute emotional improvements to change in their physical health. For some such emotionally disturbed patients it may be sufficient for GPs to treat the physical health problems and to reassure the patient, without attempting to treat the underlying emotional disturbance.
全科医生(GP)常常无法察觉仅表现出躯体症状的患者的情绪问题,但研究发现这类患者的临床结局往往与直接表现出情绪问题的患者并无差异。
比较仅向全科医生表现出躯体症状的情绪问题患者与直接表现出情绪问题的患者的临床结局及对改善情况的归因。
对一般健康问卷(GHQ)得分处于症状范围的患者进行调查,并在三个月后对患者进行重复的GHQ调查以及关于患者对改善情况归因的问卷调查。
从伦敦北部和东部的九个全科诊所选取了152名成年患者作为样本。
连续的患者在就诊前被邀请完成一份改编后的GHQ。就诊过程进行录音并编码,以表明心理讨论与其他问题讨论的程度。全科医生记录他们在就诊时是否认为每位患者存在情绪困扰或精神疾病,以评估全科医生对情绪困扰的察觉情况。为形成初始样本,在就诊后一至五天对打算表现出心理或躯体问题的患者进行访谈,并在三个月后进行随访问卷调查。
共有106名患者提供了随访信息,其中57名在初次就诊时直接表现出心理问题,49名仅表现出躯体症状。两组在三个月时的临床结局没有差异。症状改善的躯体症状患者比心理问题患者更倾向于将改善归因于身体健康的变化(68%对31%),而心理问题患者更倾向于将改善归因于全科医生在就诊时的倾听和咨询(44%对18%)。其他对改善的归因,如时间推移、生活环境变化、家人和朋友的支持、药物治疗以及“自己解决问题”,在两组中同样常见。
仅表现出躯体症状的情绪问题患者与直接表现出心理问题的患者具有相同的临床结局,但前者更倾向于将情绪改善归因于身体健康的变化。对于一些此类情绪困扰的患者,全科医生治疗其身体健康问题并安抚患者可能就足够了,无需试图治疗潜在的情绪困扰。