Levene S, Lear G H, McKenzie S A
Rush Green Hospital, Romford, Essex, U.K.
Respir Med. 1989 May;83(3):233-5. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(89)80037-x.
Four commercially available pulse oximeters were compared on normal infants to determine incidence and correct identification of movement artefact, and to assess their other features, in order to guide the potential user in the most appropriate choice of a machine to suit their purposes. Measurements of arterial oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry are distorted by movement artefact. During five one hour recording periods, over 100 artefacts occurred with each machine. The incidence of movement artefact differed between oximeters. Twice as many occurred when the Criticare 500 was used. The four oximeters differed in their ability to identify artefacts. The Novametrix 500 was best able to do this. A visual display aided observer recognition of artefacts. Other features of the different machines are described. An expansion of the use of pulse oximetry beyond the intensive care unit is suggested.
为了指导潜在用户选择最适合其需求的仪器,对四种市售脉搏血氧仪在正常婴儿身上进行了比较,以确定运动伪影的发生率和正确识别情况,并评估它们的其他特性。通过脉搏血氧测定法测量动脉血氧饱和度会因运动伪影而失真。在五个一小时的记录期间,每台仪器都出现了100多次伪影。不同血氧仪的运动伪影发生率有所不同。使用Criticare 500时出现的伪影数量是其他仪器的两倍。四种血氧仪在识别伪影的能力上存在差异。Novametrix 500在这方面表现最佳。视觉显示有助于观察者识别伪影。文中还描述了不同仪器的其他特性。建议将脉搏血氧测定法的应用范围扩大到重症监护病房之外。