Nickerson B G, Sarkisian C, Tremper K
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Children's Hospital of Oakland.
Chest. 1988 Mar;93(3):515-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.93.3.515.
We evaluated measurements of oxygen saturation from four noninvasive pulse oximeters, and two conventional arterial oximeters. Simultaneous measurements were obtained on each instrument on three different occasions in five healthy subjects breathing gas with an FIO2 of 1.00, 0.50, 0.21, 0.17, 0.15, 0.13 and 0.11. Mean bias relative to the sum of oxy-, carboxy-, and methemoglobins ranged from -0.4 to -2.6 percent for the pulse oximeters and +1.8 to -4.2 percent for the conventional oximeters. Two pulse oximeters performed well at all saturations down to 65 percent, while the others showed either increasing or decreasing bias below 80 percent saturation. Precision was approximately 2 percent for all instruments except one conventional oximeter with a precision of 0.7 percent. In the clinically relevant range, the performance of the noninvasive pulse oximeters was similar to conventional oximeters using arterial samples.
我们评估了四种无创脉搏血氧仪和两种传统动脉血氧仪的血氧饱和度测量结果。在五名健康受试者呼吸吸入氧分数(FIO2)分别为1.00、0.50、0.21、0.17、0.15、0.13和0.11的气体时,在三种不同情况下对每台仪器进行了同步测量。相对于氧合血红蛋白、碳氧血红蛋白和高铁血红蛋白总和的平均偏差,脉搏血氧仪为-0.4%至-2.6%,传统血氧仪为+1.8%至-4.2%。两台脉搏血氧仪在所有饱和度低至65%时表现良好,而其他脉搏血氧仪在饱和度低于80%时偏差则增加或减小。除一台精度为0.7%的传统血氧仪外,所有仪器的精度约为2%。在临床相关范围内,无创脉搏血氧仪的性能与使用动脉样本的传统血氧仪相似。