Greer Amy L
Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
BMC Res Notes. 2015 May 8;8:191. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1157-1.
Traditional processes for the production of pandemic influenza vaccines are not capable of producing a vaccine that could be deployed sooner than 5-6 months after strain identification. Plant-based vaccine technologies are of public health interest because they represent an opportunity to begin vaccinating earlier.
We used an age- and risk- structured disease transmission model for Canada to evaluate the potential impact of a plant-produced vaccine available for rapid deployment (within 1-3 months) compared to an egg-based vaccine timeline.
We found that in the case of a mildly transmissible virus (R0 = 1.3), depending on the amount of plant-based vaccine produced per week, severe clinical outcomes could be decreased by 60-100 % if vaccine was available within 3 months of strain identification. However, in the case of a highly transmissible virus (R0 = 2.0), a delay of 3 months does not change clinical outcomes regardless of the level of weekly vaccine availability. If transmissibility is high, the only strategy that can impact clinical outcomes occurs if vaccine production is high and available within 2 months.
Pandemic influenza vaccines produced by plants, change the timeline of pandemic vaccine availability in a way that could significantly mitigate the impact of the next influenza pandemic.
传统的大流行性流感疫苗生产工艺无法生产出在毒株鉴定后5 - 6个月内就能部署的疫苗。基于植物的疫苗技术具有公共卫生意义,因为它们提供了更早开始接种疫苗的机会。
我们使用了一个针对加拿大的按年龄和风险分层的疾病传播模型,来评估与基于鸡蛋的疫苗接种时间线相比,可快速部署(1 - 3个月内)的植物生产疫苗的潜在影响。
我们发现,对于轻度传播的病毒(R0 = 1.3),取决于每周生产的植物疫苗数量,如果在毒株鉴定后3个月内有疫苗可用,严重临床结局可降低60 - 100%。然而,对于高传播性病毒(R0 = 2.0),无论每周疫苗供应水平如何,延迟3个月都不会改变临床结局。如果传播性高,唯一能影响临床结局的策略是疫苗产量高且在2个月内可用。
植物生产的大流行性流感疫苗改变了大流行疫苗的供应时间线,从而有可能显著减轻下一次流感大流行的影响。